To Trump, and his supporters.

[Bwils]

Hillary is going to be next president. The republicans have the worst lineup ever running for president. Bernie Sanders is too extreme free college, etc... the economy couldn't support that with the amount of illegals we have taking not giving. Hillary says exactly what most people want to hear and sadly they believe her.

[Pokesan]

To expand upon Sidelle's thoughts - the next President will likely nominate 3 new SCOTUS Justices. I'd like to echo the wise words of Sidelle - "There is no chance in hell that Roe v. Wade will ever be overturned."

Thank you and god bless America.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Goliathan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It will be wonderful when we have the first woman president. But Hillary should not be that person. Not by a long shot. Pretty much all the contenders for 2016 are an absolute disaster. One hand you face disasters for civil rights and the other hand you have disasters for economic policy.

Do you choose shit shit or super shit. Trumps weird and his policies are crazy. The other guy believes God will guide him because I want a man in office who listens to voices in his head. The old dem guy would get nothing through congress and Hillary would probably send us to war again. With Ireland. Or some shit.

As a woman I want equality. But Hillary is not equality. She's not good. For anyone

I don't see that at all. He's just not a slick politician, not up there saying anything/everything he can to get elected. He was never groomed to be a modern politician as many have a life time of special grooming by political elitists to do so.

Like in the case of Hillary, hands down the most groomed politician left standing, from early college life, to being the puppet master behind slick willies presidency, and even her dealings in the 0bama administration that I hope she gets thrown in prison for. A Hillary election simply means 0bama's 3rd term, to carry on the torch. Man, the really scary thing is her holding the nuclear football [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As for "civil rights", you've just been overexposed to liberal propaganda, which is pretty thick stuff. But the rep party has been really good in regards to civil rights, historically, still impacting today. Well... excluding G.W Bush and his buffoonery (e.g. patriot act etc). Keep in mind it was the dem party that tried to filibuster the civil rights act 1964. JFK's obsession with MLK jr to expose him as a commie while his thugs terrorized him. Biden going to China and complementing them on their population control / 1 child policy (which they recently raised to wow 2!).

Unless you are speaking of the wall and being cautious with letting muslims in right now which has nothing to do with civil rights at all, though the libs are crying "racist" which is insane as islam is not a race but an ideology.

He's unpolished and speaks his mind, as a NY business man. I see nothing wrong with his intended policies, especially since he has stated he's keeping away from executive orders which is really-really great! So when it comes down to it, he is going to function as an actual constitutional president and not some mad dictator as our past couple presidents have played their hand at.

[Pokesan]

i come from a parallel earth where neither gwb or obama were mad dictators

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i come from a parallel earth where neither gwb or obama were mad dictators

Through executive orders, oh heck yeah! They have given the president way way too much power, that needs to stop.
As Reagan said, there is no left or right, only up or down.
We've never been so down.

[Pokesan]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Through executive orders, oh heck yeah! They have given the president way way too much power, that needs to stop.
As Reagan said, there is no left or right, only up or down.
We've never been so down.

Daywolf is fucking retarded

[Pokesan]

Reagan indeed.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Daywolf is fucking retarded

Well became a thing during the 20th century, but hardly used the first 100 years. I wasn't saying they didn't exist before Bush. But the usage today is more along the lines of things that no one wants, snowballs chance in hell to get passed through congress, and even using it to over ride a vote from congress in which it had already been killed. I have no problem with if the usage is used properly, but to use it abusively is wrong, and sinking into a form of dictatorship, a power grab. Case in point: President 0bama abusing executive powers.

Early usage, presidents rarely used executive orders, quite rarely

George Washington 8
John Adams 1
Thomas Jefferson 4
James Madison 1
James Monroe 1
John Quincy Adams 3
Andrew Jackson 12
Martin van Buren 10
William Henry Harrison 0
John Tyler 17
James K. Polk 18
Zachary Taylor 5
Millard Fillmore 12
Franklin Pierce 35
James Buchanan 16

[Pokesan]

Imperial Saint Ronaldus Magnus was a more tyrannical dictator than B-rock "The Islamic Shock" Superallah Hussein Obama

[Goliathan]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't see that at all. He's just not a slick politician, not up there saying anything/everything he can to get elected. He was never groomed to be a modern politician as many have a life time of special grooming by political elitists to do so.

Like in the case of Hillary, hands down the most groomed politician left standing, from early college life, to being the puppet master behind slick willies presidency, and even her dealings in the 0bama administration that I hope she gets thrown in prison for. A Hillary election simply means 0bama's 3rd term, to carry on the torch. Man, the really scary thing is her holding the nuclear football [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As for "civil rights", you've just been overexposed to liberal propaganda, which is pretty thick stuff. But the rep party has been really good in regards to civil rights, historically, still impacting today. Well... excluding G.W Bush and his buffoonery (e.g. patriot act etc). Keep in mind it was the dem party that tried to filibuster the civil rights act 1964. JFK's obsession with MLK jr to expose him as a commie while his thugs terrorized him. Biden going to China and complementing them on their population control / 1 child policy (which they recently raised to wow 2!).

Unless you are speaking of the wall and being cautious with letting muslims in right now which has nothing to do with civil rights at all, though the libs are crying "racist" which is insane as islam is not a race but an ideology.

He's unpolished and speaks his mind, as a NY business man. I see nothing wrong with his intended policies, especially since he has stated he's keeping away from executive orders which is really-really great! So when it comes down to it, he is going to function as an actual constitutional president and not some mad dictator as our past couple presidents have played their hand at.

I mean yeah. Both parties are kind of shit. The republican far right that people seem to be so much in love with worries me. The discrimination they pass dispite the Supreme Court is just awful. I don't really align with one party or another. I like guns and I think people should marry who they love. I like smaller government and I think it's no ones business what is done in the bathroom. I don't support fear mongering nor do I support religion being a basis for a political platform. Our focus should be on what's best for the country and our people. Being inclusive.

I dunno. I'm not nearly as involved with this as you are daywolf. I just find the idea of using central government to limit what one does in their life based on religious zealotry to be useless. Dems. Pubs. Both terrible. We probably need a third party to make these people willing to work together again. To compromise. To start doing what they're supposed to do.

I don't see any of the candidates really doing that. The idea of banning Muslim immigration is exactly what Isis wants. To force more to their arms. To build a wall won't fix any problems. The only way to fix it is to see these countries brought up to a point where their people aren't terrorized by drug gangs and cartels. It's not going to be fixed any time soon.

I just would like people to be moderate. Sane. Willing to compromise and not be so fucking weird or seedy or gross.