Shamans

[Nirgon]

"I need torpor and unresistable bane/unresistable double strength malosini to play a shaman."


Heh

He was actually bragging about skill during this red99 era

[Syft-X]

Originally Posted by iiNGloriouS [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Another syft account to ignore. Was hoping this firegiant would stay off the forums for good.

Nobody gives a shit about you or your opinion.

Please takes personal attacks to RnF where they belong Server chat is not intended for this, New players need valuable input based on classes as does the staff who's time is limited and unable to know whats going on at any given moment.

We have an entire forum devoted to trolling we all for the good of the community should refrain from letting it spill to other forums.

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"I need torpor and unresistable bane/unresistable double strength malosini to play a shaman."


Heh

He was actually bragging about skill during this red99 era

I bug reported malosini landing on high MR targets day one of that patch, I still remain one of the few people on the forums able to put my personal needs above the integrity of pvp, and have consistently bug reported my own classes I was "Main'ing" at the time in the benefit of the server. I bug reported aoe's unlimited range when i played a wizard and unresistable highsun when I played a bard as well.

My class choices are never based on momentary imbalances and I'm always the first one to report my own class if it threatens pvp balance.

[Doors]

Not sure why Goot is calling me out when I was the first 50 barbarian shaman on the box. Maybe do some research while leveling up whatever fotm class is now solid due to the resist changes bro.

[iiNGloriouS]

Can't wait til Doors, Salt and I are all AoN'd out rollin around boulderquesting you nerds.

The Barbarian Connection is what we'll call ourselves.

[Nirgon]

BK is trying to get fear/charm put on the server which is not classic for our current timeline, although he truly believes it is

Previously he tried to lawyer that malosini/blind spam was fine and should stay

Grade A stupid right here

[Syft-X]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

BK is trying to get fear/charm put on the server which is not classic for our current timeline, although he truly believes it is

Previously he tried to lawyer that malosini/blind spam was fine and should stay

Grade A stupid right here

Actually that isn't what I said at all, actually directly stated I was against it but everyone can read the notes for themselves.

http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=191918


It is shameful that some players try to manipulate the developers, wasting their valuable and charitable time trying to skew changes in favor of their guild or class using the argument "It's Classic" only when it benefits their personal agenda.

It would be great if we could all stop playing petitionquest and just let PvP settle our personal grievances instead of dragging the staff into player vendettas.

[Lime]

Originally Posted by Syft-X [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It was never set to 80 that's far to low that would mean anyone with DMF is immune to all poisons.

The argument for it's classic is being used to lawyer-doctor the rules to an impractical degree. Asking for classic resists on a server where the average gearset is 2-3x what it was during this era is ludicrous.

Duelist Backstabs landing for Lifeburn dmg is not Classic. Melee dmg overall set this high is not classic. They had max hits capped on live. Ac not being factored into hit or miss values is not classic. Currently hits rolls solely off weapon skill that would be like spells rolling solely off Evocation without factoring resists.

If we are gonna blindly adhere to classic when it makes no sense then we need to add stupid things like Fear and Charm on players back because...it's classic.

Dots did full pvp damage on RZ back in the day as well. Only direct damage spells were pvp reduced. The difference between Winged Death doing 110 damage per tick and 72 is a pretty large power difference. This is made even worse by items like fungi/regen races, where a dot that did 110 damage on live, is reduced to 72 on emulator, and then further nullified by worn regen race + fungi+regrowth. An iksar monk that eats a full winged death in this manner only takes 300 damage here.

Pets also did full damage so while you were fire dotted/splurted/ebolted/bonded for 100 % damage you got to enjoy 0 melee channeling + a pet quadding you for 50s and bashing you.

Epic Mage pet with resist magic and velocity and no pvp damage reduction would pretty much rambo any small group down that didn't flee to a zoneline.

Bunch of other non classic things I didn't even bother mentioning. Pretty much have to play a warrior, monk, or rogue here if you want to be an endgame pvp damage dealer. Everyone else is basically a support/utility class to them.

[Syft-X]

Originally Posted by Lime [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dots did full pvp damage on RZ back in the day as well. Only direct damage spells were pvp reduced. The difference between Winged Death doing 110 damage per tick and 72 is a pretty large power difference. This is made even worse by items like fungi/regen races, where a dot that did 110 damage on live, is reduced to 72 on emulator, and then further nullified by worn regen race + fungi+regrowth. An iksar monk that eats a full winged death in this manner only takes 300 damage here.

Pets also did full damage so while you were fire dotted/splurted/ebolted/bonded for 100 % damage you got to enjoy 0 melee channeling + a pet quadding you for 50s and bashing you.

Epic Mage pet with resist magic and velocity and no pvp damage reduction would pretty much rambo any small group down that didn't flee to a zoneline.

Bunch of other non classic things I didn't even bother mentioning. Pretty much have to play a warrior, monk, or rogue here if you want to be an endgame pvp damage dealer. Everyone else is basically a support/utility class to them.

Well the dmg reduction to dots and nukes made sense when it was instituted, but flash forward 15 years lvl in land where melee's have no dmg cap, gear is 2-3x better than majority ever attained in that era, and you get an extremely lopsided pvp in the favor of melee's. Not at all resembling Classic PvP.

[jeffd]

assuming an enemy carries pumices + cure pots, how could a shm hope to do well in a 1v1?

not trolling, fill my mind w/ knowledge

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by Lime [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dots did full pvp damage on RZ back in the day as well. Only direct damage spells were pvp reduced. The difference between Winged Death doing 110 damage per tick and 72 is a pretty large power difference. This is made even worse by items like fungi/regen races, where a dot that did 110 damage on live, is reduced to 72 on emulator, and then further nullified by worn regen race + fungi+regrowth. An iksar monk that eats a full winged death in this manner only takes 300 damage here.

Pets also did full damage so while you were fire dotted/splurted/ebolted/bonded for 100 % damage you got to enjoy 0 melee channeling + a pet quadding you for 50s and bashing you.

Epic Mage pet with resist magic and velocity and no pvp damage reduction would pretty much rambo any small group down that didn't flee to a zoneline.

Bunch of other non classic things I didn't even bother mentioning. Pretty much have to play a warrior, monk, or rogue here if you want to be an endgame pvp damage dealer. Everyone else is basically a support/utility class to them.

nope

pets did reduced dmg

lure of ice focus fire is ridiculous in mass pvp

SK is going to be real, real, real stupid (you think duelist is bad...)