Raid Suspension: TMO (Again)

[Myrtiz]

Don't they all have alts in Asgard anyways? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[arsenalpow]

There have been plenty of backwash trains in VS pit, CT engages, and Inny engages. My statement wasn't just covering VP. In fact BDA was gift wrapped that Inny kill a while back because IB trained/engaged. When it was clear they were wiping TMO/Taken moved close to pounce, train came back and finished off IB, ate Taken, and a chunk of TMO camped out.

[ClownGuild]

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There have been plenty of backwash trains in VS pit, CT engages, and Inny engages. My statement wasn't just covering VP. In fact BDA was gift wrapped that Inny kill a while back because IB trained/engaged. When it was clear they were wiping TMO/Taken moved close to pounce, train came back and finished off IB, ate Taken, and a chunk of TMO camped out.

Difference is VS and CT don't charm to wipe the aggro of the puller. Sometimes pullers resist charm in VP and it doesn't wipe and they are instructed to instantly /q.

[arsenalpow]

Originally Posted by ClownGuild [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Difference is VS and CT don't charm to wipe the aggro of the puller. Sometimes pullers resist charm in VP and it doesn't wipe and they are instructed to instantly /q.

It's stupid that the dragon attempts a charm from any distance the second he's engaged by another party after FTE. That mechanic seemed quite buggy from my limited VP pulling experience.

Back on topic though, training stuff around shouldn't be the way things get done. It makes a mess for the CSR and it discourages other guilds from making the leap to contest targets.

[ClownGuild]

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's stupid that the dragon attempts a charm from any distance the second he's engaged by another party after FTE. That mechanic seemed quite buggy from my limited VP pulling experience.

Back on topic though, training stuff around shouldn't be the way things get done. It makes a mess for the CSR and it discourages other guilds from making the leap to contest targets.

It's not really a problem or a mess in VP 90% of the time. It's actually the best way to keep aggro off of the guilds involved when done correctly. Which is why I am scratching my head at this being punishable. GMs are now basically going to punish guilds for playing with skill and keeping the zone in safe for guilds during repops.

IB of course still lacks in the skill department and sometimes trains themselves and us. SO I could see the argument of just banning them from VP permanently.

[Ravager]

Just make it so that raid mobs are perpetually up, but invulnerable. GMs get relieved of having to babysit manbabies, and players get to experience the classicness of being murdered by Gore when running to KC.

[ClownGuild]

Think of those 6 months as a Holiday gift we'll think about giving you one next Holiday season as well.

[Cecily]

Really reaching with those infractions lol. I guess we need to take to break to keep your guild from crumbling. So be it

[Fael]

This "engage stall" of silverwing and hoshkar has happened every full repop for the last 4 years. Both guilds use this strategy.

Despite what Sirken says, he has never made it clear that such strategy is off limits in vp until now.

IB of course did the same thing this past Repop. It's not a matter of "this for that" Chest. It's a matter of having a clear set of rules to play in. Sirken has long said that class C can have autonomy in vp to make their own rules. Thus It's incredibly frustrating when the referees step in and make up rules ex post facto and apply them retroactively.

Dolic

[Clark]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Really reaching with those infractions lol. I guess we need to take to break to keep your guild from crumbling. So be it