Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 09-20-2010, 06:31 PM
Kassel Kassel is offline
Fire Giant

Kassel's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 682
Default

It boogles my mind that people choose to play on as close to a classic server as technically possible, constantly request changes that are not "classic" There are many other servers available that are open to these types of suggestions, feel free to play on those. This server is designed to be classic and every single request to add a non classic element is just plain idiotic. It has nothing to do with "harm" or "balance", it has everything to do with the fundamental reason this server exists. This post is most likely a troll. But regardless, your request is not classic (including trilogy) so GTFO.
  #32  
Old 09-20-2010, 07:22 PM
nalkin nalkin is offline
Fire Giant

nalkin's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 894
Default

Actually, as demonstrated in the past, the "its classic" argument is not valid since there have been classic elements chosen not to be implemented. So its a "sort of trying to be close to classic as possible" server with dev choices playing a factor. So if yuns think about it, beastlord isn't really that bad of a question... Of course beastlords are stupid so it really is but ya know what im saying.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruman View Post
Hahaha, that is awesome. Right up there with...that one guy's....boat service before the boats worked.
  #33  
Old 09-20-2010, 07:30 PM
Kassel Kassel is offline
Fire Giant

Kassel's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 682
Default

Quote:
as close to a classic server as technically possible
....for people who do this on their free time as a favor to you......


Better?

I feel " its not classic" is very valid.
  #34  
Old 09-20-2010, 08:00 PM
liveitup1216 liveitup1216 is offline
Fire Giant

liveitup1216's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 607
Default

my only point that if it turns out the devs say "beastlord could be easily implemented without much hassle", there's no real reason to lulzwtfcomplain.

it probably isnt, probably wont happen, but to demand it doesnt happen is equally douchy.
  #35  
Old 09-20-2010, 08:06 PM
Tseng Tseng is offline
Sarnak

Tseng's Avatar

Join Date: May 2010
Location: (n.) a place of settlement, activity, or residence
Posts: 299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldfart [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
lol are these people for real? beastlords, lvl cap 85 at velious? cmon people, just get off your high horses, lets do it classic like it was ment to be
I thought my post at the very least was obviously sarcastic.
__________________
Sima Yi - 56 Dark Elf Enchanter
Kashius - 54 Iksar Necromancer
Tseng - 52 Human Druid
Methlab - 50 Troll Shadow Knight
Kemba - 19 Monk
  #36  
Old 09-20-2010, 08:24 PM
Savard18 Savard18 is offline
Aviak

Savard18's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 59
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by liveitup1216 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
my only point that if it turns out the devs say "beastlord could be easily implemented without much hassle", there's no real reason to lulzwtfcomplain.

it probably isnt, probably wont happen, but to demand it doesnt happen is equally douchy.
I disagree, it is a lot more reasonable to ask for it to not happen on a server that is "as close to a classic server as technically possible" than it would be to ask for it to happen. If Luclin was planned to be added I wouldn't bother to post, but I doubt it will happen.
  #37  
Old 09-20-2010, 08:32 PM
Bubbles Bubbles is offline
Fire Giant

Bubbles's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 965
Default

If you're looking for something "far more reasonable":

Halfling Rangers/Paladins, Gnome Shadowknights, etc.

Since their sole purpose would be amusing people until kunark was released, it would give a couple extra bored people a new class/race combo or two to play around with.

But once again, it's not classic, and certainly not worth the dev's time at this point.

The only purpose adding beastlords would have is to take some of the "lolyourclasssux0r" heat off of rangers.
__________________
Bubbles HatesMelees, Cleric
Miley Vyrus, Necro
Hail Balls, Warrior

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uthgaard View Post
Most of the people with bad experiences with me hang out in R&F, shocking, looks like I'm doing something right.
  #38  
Old 09-20-2010, 08:33 PM
liveitup1216 liveitup1216 is offline
Fire Giant

liveitup1216's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubbles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The only purpose adding beastlords would have is to take some of the "lolyourclasssux0r" heat off of rangers.
hahahaha, poor rangers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #39  
Old 09-20-2010, 08:45 PM
Nedala Nedala is offline
Planar Protector

Nedala's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,014
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by liveitup1216 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"Though Shadows of Luclin doesn't extend EverQuest's experience level cap past 60, it does allow for characters of 51st level or above to earn powerful, new abilities in place of experience levels." - taken from a review on gamespot 12/20/01

.

hmmm i was about sure lvl cap was increased to 65 with luclin....it was not???
  #40  
Old 09-20-2010, 08:55 PM
loneless999 loneless999 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 268
Default

i dont see a prob with beastlords being added it wont ruin my P1999 experience

once veliouse is done and dusted people are going to want new things to keep the game intresting a game HAS to evolve even if its not the way live went and the devs do there own thing

going through all the item database to redo everything for a new class not to mention the beastlord epic most of which took place on luclin would be a real pain in the ass to do and im sure the devs have higher prioritys at the mement
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:37 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.