![]() |
|
#33
|
|||
|
I'm trying to keep an open mind about the intent of the OP. I only read the first 2.4 pages before I skipped to a response so I don't know if someone said: When they do RMT ban waves, that is a lot like (exactly like) removing a significant portion of PP and items from the game.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#35
|
|||
|
This idea completely ignores the middle class. This entire concept does. Its american politics in my elf sim noooooo! The majority of the population that plays are not FTE that grind hundreds of thousands of platinum. Nor are they brand new.
The problem with these ideas are that the effects impact only the player in the midst of their journey through Norrath. The high end legendary item grinders will instantly begin the grind for more PPs and items again upon any economic intervention. They will quickly reacquire a stranglehold on the market and dominate the tunnel once more if not on a grander scale. While this happens, the majority of players like myself cant transfer the mid level items we have on one character to an alt that we might want to play instead. My moneys gone (that in mid game comes exponentially slower than it does 50+) and my items are restricted that I probably wanted to recycle and use to level up an alt after I looted my first raid item drop. And then there are the new players who are affected by this minimally to none. Maybe its my personal ties to the issue... or just that i dont think using a big brother hand to guide the market into "fairness" or "more classic" will work in any scenario. especially since the (as stated above) timeline here far outstretches that of live and the preventative measures were not put in place beforehand. | ||
|
Last edited by deadlycupcakez; 04-10-2014 at 04:22 PM..
|
|
||
|
#36
|
|||||
|
Quote:
You made an analogy comparing EQ to a race in order to prove a point. I explained why that wasn't a valid analogy. You then stated "it could or couldn't be a race, that has nothing to do with the analogy I gave." A statement which, frankly, makes no sense. Quote:
| ||||
|
Last edited by Mirana; 04-10-2014 at 04:23 PM..
|
|
||||
|
#37
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#38
|
|||
|
All of these suggestions would likely just make it harder for new players. People with a ton of plat aren't going to cry about losing a few % because they had to convert it into gems, and then they are just going to charge you 5x as much for fungis.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#39
|
|||
|
well unfortunately they eventually turned into RMTers... so a lot are gone but why do you think the raiding policy is what it is... bc yes. guilds and on smaller scales groups and trio/duo's do that.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#40
|
||||
|
Quote:
Honestly, if things being too expensive is the issue, all you have to do is wait. With an infinite supply of platinum and items, supply should outstrip demand. Even if it doesn't and EC traders buy up cheap sells to resell at profit to keep prices up, the buyer has the option to try for the camp themselves. Barring that, farming plat. Barring that, not giving a flying rat turd about that item. So "consumers" have options here. Intervention from on high would solve nothing, merely complicate things. While I applaud the thinking of the greater good, the methods suggested by OP would not work. For the sake of argument, how about a plat-cap? Each character can only hold up to X amount of platinum on their bank/person. Would force prices lower to keep them accessible and limit the supply of platinum coming into the EQonomy.
__________________
----
Vlakraien - Wood Elf Druid | Liito (Atraydeez)- Dark Elf Cleric | Rahban (Haarkonin) - Troll Warrior | Stylgarr (Freman) - Barbarian Rogue | Pytur (Dvries) - Erudite Necromancer | Gernie (Hallek) - Human Bard | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|