Shaman or Enchanter?

[thieros]

are yall not 100% busy as a chanter?! im prolly doing it wrong

[webrunner5]

Originally Posted by thieros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

are yall not 100% busy as a chanter?! im prolly doing it wrong

Yep you are doing something wrong. I am not saying they are easy but a LOT easier than a Shaman.

[Danth]

Shaman is a busy class, and fairly complicated to play well, but I'm not sure I'd call it stressful. Activities like canni--torpor--canni become more or less muscle memory after you've done it for awhile. It's not the same thing as the local Enchanter having some charmed/hasted pet that can break and bite his face off at any given moment.

Shaman is a wretchedly expensive class, however, if you want to deck it out in top-grade equipment and get all the spells without having to get them as drops. That should factor in to anyone electing to play one as a main.

Danth

[Pyrion]

For ease of soloing i would consider also mage, necro or druid. If solo is really your focus all of them are at least easier than shaman or enchanter. Of course, enchanter can be a power house if you know how to play it really well, but necro mage or druid are much more forgiving (especially necro where you can just FD)

So for a starter mostly solo player i would advice necro. Very versatile class btw, almost as versatile as chanter.

[Clark]

Shaman and Enchanter both great choices.

[blondeattk]

shm/chanter/necro are THE 3 best solo classes.

Necro have the best damage output without any stress, but are IMO the least fun of the 3 to play.

Fell in luv with shm class in 2000 and so am totally biased) shm/cleric only caster classes where you can do melee damage.....can tap tank on necro but its normally temp option.