Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-08-2014, 03:17 PM
Bamz4l Bamz4l is offline
Sarnak

Bamz4l's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elderan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Basically RD just wants to contest dragons...
ftfy
  #2  
Old 02-08-2014, 04:18 PM
Slathar Slathar is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,651
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elderan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Basically RD just wants uncontested dragons...

Simple as that...
Your use of ellipses is incorrect. You're also terrible at Everquest. Can we get a ban on this clown?
  #3  
Old 02-08-2014, 07:54 PM
thisuserwasbannedlol thisuserwasbannedlol is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 265
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elderan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Basically RD just wants uncontested dragons...

Simple as that...
Isnt that what you have now?


OH WAIT NEVERMIND
  #4  
Old 02-08-2014, 11:37 PM
Technique Technique is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 451
Default

First it was guard assist. Then it was xp loss. Later it was (and still is) resists. Next it was global OOC. After that, yellow text. Then variance. At some point, a teams-ruleset server. Recently, the PNP. Now it's simulated patches.

(And of course the ceaseless whimpering for a wipe, that ever-present motif underlying this symphony of tears.)

The real question is: what "solution" to an imaginary problem will this culture of manbabies cry for next?
  #5  
Old 02-08-2014, 11:52 PM
Tradesonred Tradesonred is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ecoli
Posts: 4,287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Technique [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
First it was guard assist. Then it was xp loss. Later it was (and still is) resists. Next it was global OOC. After that, yellow text. Then variance. At some point, a teams-ruleset server. Recently, the PNP. Now it's simulated patches.

(And of course the ceaseless whimpering for a wipe, that ever-present motif underlying this symphony of tears.)

The real question is: what "solution" to an imaginary problem will this culture of manbabies cry for next?
Long time no see Harrison, how are the kids
  #6  
Old 02-09-2014, 02:59 AM
Samuell Samuell is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Elderan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Basically RD just wants uncontested dragons...

Simple as that...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Telron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Considering its a systemwide msg you have the chance to be there too. Sounds more like competition than anything else.[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Any time the server full repops RD has a chance for an uncontested dragon since Nihilum can't always kill/guard all mobs simultaneously. Once we all know the timer and can contest in sequence (like at the last Faydedar) the people who usually criticize Nihilum for being too blue instead criticize Nihilum for PvPing over a dragon.

Knowing the timer for each dragon guarantees direct competition if people really wanted it.
  #7  
Old 02-09-2014, 01:25 PM
Loto Loto is offline
Kobold

Loto's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Alefgard
Posts: 144
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samuell [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Any time the server full repops RD has a chance for an uncontested dragon since Nihilum can't always kill/guard all mobs simultaneously. Once we all know the timer and can contest in sequence (like at the last Faydedar) the people who usually criticize Nihilum for being too blue instead criticize Nihilum for PvPing over a dragon.
Why do you feel the need to guard any raid mob that you arent in the process of killing at that moment?
__________________
http://www.project1999.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=32016&dateline=137200  2039
  #8  
Old 02-09-2014, 02:04 PM
heartbrand heartbrand is offline
Planar Protector

heartbrand's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: The Wire
Posts: 9,758
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why do you feel the need to guard any raid mob that you arent in the process of killing at that moment?
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle"
  #9  
Old 02-09-2014, 03:20 PM
Technique Technique is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why do you feel the need to guard any raid mob that you arent in the process of killing at that moment?
The point is to prevent opposing guilds from killing it and obtaining its loot.

I'm beginning to understand the mentality of people who play on a red server, yet feel sad/indignant/simply baffled that the dominant guild doesn't throw them any bones: They think of PvE and PvP as entirely separate concerns.

The fact is they're inseparably coupled in EQ for two reasons.
  1. The rewards from PvE strongly affect a player's success in PvP.
  2. Conflict is meaningless unless it's over something. Historically, that something has almost always been resources of some kind or another. Here there's only one resource: monster loot.
If you're not fighting over monster loot, what's the sense in fighting at all? For the "fun" of it? The outcome of combat in this game is usually predetermined by circumstances prior to the fight and rarely is it possible to make a comeback. Those aren't mechanics that make for a particularly fun PvP experience in and of itself, which means people who profess to play EQ for the PvP are either lying or just fools who don't realize they'd be better off in a game with more symmetrical combat.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Colgate [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
there is no pvp when you guys show up with triple the numbers of your opposition
You're retarded if you think that Nihilum can field 3x the opposition's numbers at a single encounter and still have the reserves needed to guard the others.
  #10  
Old 02-09-2014, 03:21 PM
rusty81 rusty81 is offline
Fire Giant

rusty81's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Moon
Posts: 605
Default

Population +1
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:47 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.