Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-05-2014, 01:01 PM
Daysprung Daysprung is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 55
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanthallas [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We definitely werent. I wouldnt be so liberally with the use of the word 'definitely'.
The situation has been dealt with but don't claim you never did something that you used to do.
  #32  
Old 02-05-2014, 01:03 PM
Tanthallas Tanthallas is offline
Fire Giant

Tanthallas's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 577
Default

From the day that the new raid rules were made we adhered to them whenever we joint raided. Our MOTDs on the first races under the new raid rules were very explicit about not having more than 2 representatives combined between FE and IB in the instances that we are planning on joint raiding.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daliant17447 View Post
more ducktape than exploit
  #33  
Old 02-05-2014, 01:04 PM
Thana8088 Thana8088 is offline
Fire Giant

Thana8088's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 533
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I heard Bob was looking to absorb some guilds, maybe TMO could fold into them.
Want to start raiding together bebe? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Catterine - 60 Druidess
Kattarina - 60 Shaman
Angellus - 60 Cleric
Pickahippy - 52 Druid
*******************
All priest, all the time.
  #34  
Old 02-05-2014, 01:16 PM
chief chief is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 256
Default

TBH i was wondering about this situation as well until this last repop day happened, it had fe ib raiding separately. FE wiped to trak, ib killed ct but got trained by bda(lol frapsquest). IB moved to vp which wasn't a success either, and they only really threatened TMO when FE started to bring their force. KInd of a risk v reward thing and I'm fine with it as long as they don't abuse the tracking thing. Also if one of the guilds were to get suspended on a joint raid, I hope it applies to both.
  #35  
Old 02-05-2014, 01:17 PM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thana8088 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Want to start raiding together bebe? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We once raided together, Catterine. And Zilo, and Arky. But it's all gone now ~_~
  #36  
Old 02-05-2014, 01:20 PM
Raavak Raavak is offline
Planar Protector

Raavak's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Creepin' inta your back door.
Posts: 2,038
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raymond [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you decide to share the kill with another guild then that is great and is your choice.
Once they combine forces the rules should apply the same as if they were a single guild from the start, otherwise you are asking for trouble and much douchebaggery.
__________________
[60 Sorcerer] Rakpartha (Erudite)
[60 High Priest] Doktyr (Dwarf)
[45 Shadow Knight] Elandrea (Dark Elf)
  #37  
Old 02-05-2014, 01:25 PM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Raavak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Once they combine forces the rules should apply the same as if they were a single guild from the start, otherwise you are asking for trouble and much douchebaggery.
hnggg, that avatar again rak [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Also, yeah, this was cleared up in the clarification post and ib/fe really only has 2 representatives between them at all raid targets. Phara Dar on the other hand... o_O
  #38  
Old 02-05-2014, 01:35 PM
arsenalpow arsenalpow is offline
Planar Protector

arsenalpow's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,225
Default

We didn't train IB at that CT. They rushed an engage and wiped, then we desynced and wiped, then they won. Fear is a stupid zone.
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth
Wielder of the Celestial Fists
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood Hogan
The first thing you gotta' realize, brother, is this right here is the future of wrestling. You can call this the New World Order of Wrestling.
  #39  
Old 02-05-2014, 01:39 PM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daysprung [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Not true. Can't speak to recent events but a few weeks ago you were definitely using more than 2 reps in a lot of instances.
This is "definately" a complete fabrication. Even before the new rules were implemented there were posts on our forums, discussions in vent and very explicit guild motds that state FE/IB is only allowed to have two representatives between both guilds.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chief [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
TBH i was wondering about this situation as well until this last repop day happened, it had fe ib raiding separately. FE wiped to trak, ib killed ct but got trained by bda(lol frapsquest). IB moved to vp which wasn't a success either, and they only really threatened TMO when FE started to bring their force. KInd of a risk v reward thing and I'm fine with it as long as they don't abuse the tracking thing. Also if one of the guilds were to get suspended on a joint raid, I hope it applies to both.
Exactly, thank you. It's about risk vs reward. I tried to make this argument a week or two ago, and it got shit on because neither guild had really failed yet. Well now we have, and it cost us an entire VP respawn. Hopefully this anti FE/IB joint raid argument can be put to rest now.
  #40  
Old 02-05-2014, 01:47 PM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
We didn't train IB at that CT. They rushed an engage and wiped, then we desynced and wiped, then they won. Fear is a stupid zone.
I think everyone agrees that the fear desyncs are ridiculous. I've always wondered why it's so common in fear compared to other zones, too.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.