![]() |
|
#34
|
|||
|
I like how the "TMO gearing their #th alt" meme is creeping up.
When I first started it was "oh TMO's gearing their alt." During the raid negotiations it was "TMO's 3rd alt" or "TMO 4th alt" pretty consistently. Now we're up to 7th alts. I wish I had 7 alts. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#35
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The min/max queen has spoken! | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
#36
|
||||
|
Quote:
Occupy! | |||
|
|
||||
|
#38
|
|||
|
If I were min/max royalty, would I have a wiz, a SK, and a ranger as 3 of my 4 alts? Would I just this week have gotten 60 on a second alt (with the others being 43, 35, and 33)? Would I have my SK in CoM to group and my necro in MM to group (where he gets turned down for groups, actually - cause who would want nearly-free heals and pet+RoA DPS in their groups right?)?
I don't care how people play so long as they aren't trying to force their way on me. Why do people keep bringing up my alts? LIke I said, I have 4, one of which doesn't need any more xp or gear, and 3 of which ONLY group and don't need any more gear. Me playing alts = random PUGs in CoM winning shit by default cause I don't roll on wu's trance sticks. Me playing alts = twinked-ass characters helping non-epic rogues get xp. Etc. I AM Sirken-confirmed 1% though. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#39
|
|||
|
When you pick a class/race combo that has by far the largest xp penalty in the game, you are bound to run into more situations where people consider that before grouping with you.
It's you, not everyone else. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#40
|
|||
|
again, no one is saying they should be forced to let non-optimal/exp penalty classes in, but the jury's in on you being a dick if that's the basis of your decision.
im the jury | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|