This story is fantastic.

[runlvlzero]

Originally Posted by Kagatob [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My point is that you want to limit the rights of who can breed but somehow you think it's fine to have no legislation of firearms.

Eh you make a good point.

[runlvlzero]

Let me pose these following questions though. And I gather your answer already but.

Would gun control or reproductive control contribute more to the wellbeing of society overall? Where should we focus our efforts most?

Obviously my answers are, reproductive control would have a high priority, while gun control should have a low and unobtrusive level of focus.

[runlvlzero]

My justification for my answer, is higher quality of life + people + education would mean gun control would be virtually unnecessary, but thats an idealistic situation and may not be entirely realistic.

If your argument is that "we already have issues with urban crowding, with low living standards" and "therefor in those situations gun control would be more beneficial" I could even bring myself to agree with your point of view.

[runlvlzero]

But than, America is a huge place. I don't think the federal government is the right place to enact stricter controls. This should be relegated to state firearm/tobacco/and alcohol baeuro (even though many are corrupt since the prohibition).

[runlvlzero]

To be honest the only reason to do it at the Federal level is to use military force or FBI, NSA, CIA, TSA, etc to enforce it.

[Tenlaar]

For fuck's sake brah, take a moment to decide if you're finished rambling before you hit post.

[runlvlzero]

Originally Posted by Tenlaar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For fuck's sake brah, take a moment to decide if you're finished rambling before you hit post.

Yaw, sometimes I get going though...