Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-19-2013, 10:54 PM
Colgate Colgate is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 6,145
Default

agree nukes are landing way too hard, melee 1 hand damage does seem too high, and melees in general hit way too much; even against high AC classes like warriors i consistently hit them. it seems like monks are the only class with good avoidance(insane avoidance if you ask me)

2 hand damage seems okay, though
  #2  
Old 10-20-2013, 01:16 AM
DeadlyApostle DeadlyApostle is offline
Kobold

DeadlyApostle's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 125
Default

With the last update I definately notice a difference in melee hits with one handers. It seems when you made defensive and and stonestance work in pvp it also turned on AC for melee hits.

As a Paladin, monks and rogues are definately not able to put out the same DPS on me anymore. I do not care if it looks like you hit us too often when you very rarely do max damage on a hit.

Cloth casters have never been able to tank a melee for extended periods of time and I think that them getting hit for more now is also alright. 2handed weapons do not seem to be affected by this and I still do mostly 50 damage hits in pvp.

The channeling issue, however, must be addressed. The previous dev made it so spell are way too easy to interrupt to give melees in classic a fighting chance. Tables are turned now and it should definately go back to classic where you can channel through a single melee who isn't bashing you easily.
  #3  
Old 10-20-2013, 11:30 PM
Alecta Alecta is offline
VIP / Contributor


Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Red '99
Posts: 271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadlyApostle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
With the last update I definately notice a difference in melee hits with one handers. It seems when you made defensive and and stonestance work in pvp it also turned on AC for melee hits.
Yeah, AC impacts in pvp melee were on my todo list, but I hadnt gotten around to digging into it yet. Would be nice if adding the mitigation bonuses to pvp combat fixed that, but I think there is still work to be done there (and bugs that I introduced to be fixed.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadlyApostle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
2handed weapons do not seem to be affected by this and I still do mostly 50 damage hits in pvp.
2handers are on a gimped damage table until Velious, iirc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadlyApostle [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The channeling issue, however, must be addressed. The previous dev made it so spell are way too easy to interrupt to give melees in classic a fighting chance. Tables are turned now and it should definately go back to classic where you can channel through a single melee who isn't bashing you easily.
I am open to that. At this point push + stuns + interrupts probably don't need an additional bonus per hit.
  #4  
Old 10-21-2013, 08:46 AM
Nizzarr Nizzarr is offline
Planar Protector

Nizzarr's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alecta [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Yeah, AC impacts in pvp melee were on my todo list, but I hadnt gotten around to digging into it yet. Would be nice if adding the mitigation bonuses to pvp combat fixed that, but I think there is still work to be done there (and bugs that I introduced to be fixed.)



2handers are on a gimped damage table until Velious, iirc.



I am open to that. At this point push + stuns + interrupts probably don't need an additional bonus per hit.
They made the interrupt for PVE mostly. You could get hit 20-30 times and channel spells pretty much all the time. We do not want that back.
  #5  
Old 10-21-2013, 11:33 AM
Alecta Alecta is offline
VIP / Contributor


Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Red '99
Posts: 271
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nizzarr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
They made the interrupt for PVE mostly. You could get hit 20-30 times and channel spells pretty much all the time. We do not want that back.
I am talking about the PvP specific bits, such as:
Code:
//Null:  PvP channeling mod stuff
channelchance -= (pvp_attacked_count * 5); //Null:  Yea, 5%...you heard me
Looking at the code, its seem to be:
  • For mobs hitting clients, 2% chance to interrupt per hit, capped at 15 hits = 30% chance max.
  • For PvP, it's a 5% chance to interrupt, with no cap.

Also, Pudge re: melee push in pvp, I'd have to check and see if that rule is enabled in the database when I get back. You've got a good point that it might not be.
  #6  
Old 10-21-2013, 01:18 AM
Pudge Pudge is offline
Planar Protector

Pudge's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,523
Default

Does melee push now work in PvP? Thought it didnt
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by heartbrand View Post
Beware of this poster, he makes unsubstantiated claims and attacks on people
  #7  
Old 10-21-2013, 01:26 AM
Smedy Smedy is offline
Planar Protector

Smedy's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 4,575
Default

before nerfing nukes into the ground and making melee unstoppable powerhouses (aren't they already?) please fix so casters can refresh their spell gems with jboots, like it was in classic.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slathar View Post
you clean plaque off peoples teeth for a living and are only able to do that because your daddy hired you. your waist is also wider than your shoulders and you’re 5’2.
Videos
Wipe it clean.
  #8  
Old 10-21-2013, 08:42 AM
Nizzarr Nizzarr is offline
Planar Protector

Nizzarr's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Smedy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
before nerfing nukes into the ground and making melee unstoppable powerhouses (aren't they already?) please fix so casters can refresh their spell gems with jboots, like it was in classic.
they dont introduce bugs back
  #9  
Old 10-21-2013, 08:48 AM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nizzarr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
they dont introduce bugs back
Sure they do. Taunt bug was put in place purposely for like 6 or 8 months.
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:08 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.