Question about queers and child touchers

[Malice_Mizer]

All bestiality alanogists:

As soon as animals receive Constitutional protections, are recognized as legally human, and PETA gets all its ever wanted, this analogy will make sense.

But since gay Americans ARE protected by the Constitution but animals are not, this analogy makes little to no sense whatsoever.

[Flamewraith]

So I'm reading barkingturtles very informative article on the male genitals and I lost my shit hard on the "glancing pirate" part. Like literally spit drink and almost dropped my keyboard lost my shit.

[Malice_Mizer]

Also, what is the connection between homosexuality and pedophilia? I hear all sorts of unsubstantiated correlative connections made by people, and it's seriously confusing. Regardless of the the high likelihood that OP was trolling, you hear this shit all of the time.

Even liberals do this, though. I remember Thomas Roberts of MSNBC coming out, and he said, "When I was a child, I was molested by my priest, etc. etc." as though that is why he's gay. There exists plenty of pedophiles of all varieties. Let's not forget all of the insane Japanese hentai that is explicitly depicting female child abuse. Hell, that sort of animation is ILLEGAL in many countries (Canada included) because it's regarded as pedophilic.

The connection between homosexuality and pedophilia is bizarre and totally distorts the nature of sexuality into a polarity rather than a wide-spanning, healthy spectrum of appetites. Pedophilia is not included in this spectrum, just like rape/control fetish or bestiality isn't, because it is inherently victimizing and involves non-consenting parties.

PS You need to change your fucking sig Grahm. Seen that gif a million times and it destroys my browser bc hueg.

[Froglok]

Originally Posted by Malice_Mizer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also, what is the connection between homosexuality and pedophilia?

Republicans

[Grahm]

Originally Posted by Malice_Mizer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also, what is the connection between homosexuality and pedophilia? I hear all sorts of unsubstantiated correlative connections made by people, and it's seriously confusing. Regardless of the the high likelihood that OP was trolling, you hear this shit all of the time.

Even liberals do this, though. I remember Thomas Roberts of MSNBC coming out, and he said, "When I was a child, I was molested by my priest, etc. etc." as though that is why he's gay. There exists plenty of pedophiles of all varieties. Let's not forget all of the insane Japanese hentai that is explicitly depicting female child abuse. Hell, that sort of animation is ILLEGAL in many countries (Canada included) because it's regarded as pedophilic.

The connection between homosexuality and pedophilia is bizarre and totally distorts the nature of sexuality into a polarity rather than a wide-spanning, healthy spectrum of appetites. Pedophilia is not included in this spectrum, just like rape/control fetish or bestiality isn't, because it is inherently victimizing and involves non-consenting parties.

PS You need to change your fucking sig Grahm. Seen that gif a million times and it destroys my browser bc hueg.

There argument is that you are born that way....why would you get crucified for it? and for your spectrum argument, not to long ago people were saying the same exact thing about homosexuals. And I literally just gave you an example of a consenting party, but would be still labeled a child molester.

You're taking my statements and making it seem like I'm suggesting 60 year old men should be able to do whatever they want with 6 year olds, which is a whole other argument. I'm saying if there is a boy/girl at 12-15 years old and a 30 year old wants to have sex with them, while both consenting, they shouldn't be crucified.

PS. no

[Malice_Mizer]

Originally Posted by Grahm [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There argument is that you are born that way....why would you get crucified for it? and for your spectrum argument, not to long ago people were saying the same exact thing about homosexuals. And I literally just gave you an example of a consenting party, but would be still labeled a child molester.

You're taking my statements and making it seem like I'm suggesting 60 year old men should be able to do whatever they want with 6 year olds, which is a whole other argument. I'm saying if there is a boy/girl at 12-15 years old and a 30 year old wants to have sex with them, while both consenting, they shouldn't be crucified.

PS. no

... Ok. There is an entire legal aspect of this story. You see, the States make up "laws" that determine when a person is legally ABLE to "consent" to sexual activity with another person. A 12 year old girl, no matter what they personally have to say about the situation, cannot LEGALLY consent to sexual intercourse. Two people, no matter what crazy shit they can come up with, if they are consenting, can do whatever the hell they want sexually now that sodomy laws are unconstitutional. Pedophilia is not even in the realm of homosexuality because it, by definition, involves an individual who is legally incapable of consenting. Does this make sense?

And my entire point is that "homosexuality" is part of the spectrum of sexuality. Human sexuality is not a polar thing, where you have strictly heterosexual people and strictly homosexual people. It simply does not work that way.

[Grahm]

Originally Posted by Malice_Mizer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

... Ok. There is an entire legal aspect of this story. You see, the States make up "laws" that determine when a person is legally ABLE to "consent" to sexual activity with another person. A 12 year old girl, no matter what they personally have to say about the situation, cannot LEGALLY consent to sexual intercourse. Two people, no matter what crazy shit they can come up with, if they are consenting, can do whatever the hell they want sexually now that sodomy laws are unconstitutional. Pedophilia is not even in the realm of homosexuality because it, by definition, involves an individual who is legally incapable of consenting. Does this make sense?

And my entire point is that "homosexuality" is part of the spectrum of sexuality. Human sexuality is not a polar thing, where you have strictly heterosexual people and strictly homosexual people. It simply does not work that way.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodomy_..._United_States

Homosexuality (among other ridiculous things) was against the law up until 2003 in many states.

[Malice_Mizer]

Originally Posted by Malice_Mizer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

... Ok. There is an entire legal aspect of this story. You see, the States make up "laws" that determine when a person is legally ABLE to "consent" to sexual activity with another person. A 12 year old girl, no matter what they personally have to say about the situation, cannot LEGALLY consent to sexual intercourse. Two people, no matter what crazy shit they can come up with, if they are consenting, can do whatever the hell they want sexually now that sodomy laws are unconstitutional. Pedophilia is not even in the realm of homosexuality because it, by definition, involves an individual who is legally incapable of consenting. Does this make sense?

And my entire point is that "homosexuality" is part of the spectrum of sexuality. Human sexuality is not a polar thing, where you have strictly heterosexual people and strictly homosexual people. It simply does not work that way.

[Hasbinbad]

Things pedophiles say:

Originally Posted by Grahm [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm saying if there is a boy/girl at 12-15 years old and a 30 year old wants to have sex with them, while both consenting, they shouldn't be crucified.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Things pedophiles say:

18 is a ridiculous minimum age and the United States is among the only countries with age of consent so high.

16 is much more reasonable no matter which way you swing it, a year maybe two with parental consent. Oh wait most of the states have already taken initiative and do exactly this. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]