what is the hardest race/class combo for a new player with no guild/friends on R99

[Swyft]

Number 1: Gnome Warrior
Number 2: Erudite Paladin
Number 3: Anything Ranger

All three of those classes are so bad at solo'ing and lvling, not to mention heavily gear dependent, that no one would even consider rolling one as there first character unless they had the full support of a guild.

[Edame]

The problem with Paladins is their DPS is incredibly terrible, combined with the hybrid penalty..

I once was running through Lesser Faydark on my Level 31 Erudite Paladin in full bronze and a Ghoulbane and a shadow man aggrod me (light blue con). I had full HP and full mana with Lay on Hands up, so I figured I could solo it.

I died, even having used Lay on Hands.

[HippoNipple]

Originally Posted by Edame [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The problem with Paladins is their DPS is incredibly terrible, combined with the hybrid penalty..

I once was running through Lesser Faydark on my Level 31 Erudite Paladin in full bronze and a Ghoulbane and a shadow man aggrod me (light blue con). I had full HP and full mana with Lay on Hands up, so I figured I could solo it.

I died, even having used Lay on Hands.

Shadow men are beasts for their level though. Hard to go by them. Any warrior would have had a tough time as well.

[Itap]

Originally Posted by Edame [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The problem with Paladins is their DPS is incredibly terrible, combined with the hybrid penalty..

I once was running through Lesser Faydark on my Level 31 Erudite Paladin in full bronze and a Ghoulbane and a shadow man aggrod me (light blue con). I had full HP and full mana with Lay on Hands up, so I figured I could solo it.

I died, even having used Lay on Hands.

This. Weak dps combined with horrendous hp/str and very few offensive spells, my vote is still erudite paladin.

Quick, someone roll a gnome warrior and someone else an erudite paladin and /duel. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Nuncio]

Originally Posted by Itap [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This. Weak dps combined with horrendous hp/str and very few offensive spells, my vote is still erudite paladin.

Quick, someone roll a gnome warrior and someone else an erudite paladin and /duel. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

DE still worse.
Starting:

Race str sta dex agi
Gnome 70 80 85 90
Delf 70 75 75 90


DE has mad int though.

[Tippett]

agree should be DE WAR for maximum harshness ala Billy

[Nuncio]

Ive already got one at 24. I'll duel any level 24 non-twink erudite pally! Self buffs only (lmfao).

[Pudge]

Ogre SK. Or troll maybe, but trolls get regen so they can solo better. Ogre Sk = 61% penalty. Troll Sk = 68%. As a hybrid with such a high penalty, no one wants to group you, especially if they don't know you. They much rather solo their exp or group with a warrior, who has 0% exp penalty.

Only thing to do is fear kite with a shitty weapon for days on end in a zone no one traffics, hoping a druid doesnt come across you on his journey to quadville and decide to finally explode your face after he runs circles around you because he has SoW + lev, and you don't.

[Tippett]

you are retarded if you think sk is harder to level then war

nothing more is needed

soloing in any way possible > not soloing

[Pudge]

warriors can get groups.. SKs can't.

bet you anything if a warrior and an SK started server and invested same amount of time, the one hitting 60 first would be the warrior