Israeli War Crimes Thread

[Gravydoo II]

I noticed you skipped over this.
https://blogs.findlaw.com/greedy_ass...ing-facts.html

Dont skip over it. Its not going away.
https://blogs.findlaw.com/greedy_ass...ing-facts.html

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I noticed you skipped over this.
https://blogs.findlaw.com/greedy_ass...ing-facts.html

Dont skip over it. Its not going away.
https://blogs.findlaw.com/greedy_ass...ing-facts.html

Bob’s blog has some in depth insightful info? Not a priority read for me right now, maybe sometime late

Edit: also, I think I’ve watched MAYBE 5 Tucker Carlson segments in my lifetime. Never once watched Hannity. Never once watched Alex Jones. But believe whatever you want to believe about where I get my information

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I noticed you skipped over this.
https://blogs.findlaw.com/greedy_ass...ing-facts.html

Dont skip over it. Its not going away.
https://blogs.findlaw.com/greedy_ass...ing-facts.html

Ok, turns out this was a lot shorter than I expected, so I read it

Sounds like the person who wrote this is bitter that Fox found a crafty way to escape a libel lawsuit. Do I agree with their tactics? Not completely, but I don’t know the circumstances of the libel lawsuit. If it was a really solid case, then Tucker should have just settled, it’s not like he can’t afford it. But that’s clearly all this was, a legal tactic to avoid a libel lawsuit. And apparently it worked, so bravo. And bring on the bitterness regarding the tactic. I guarantee you Fox doesn’t think Tucker Carlson is lying when he reports the news. They lied about not believing him, and the stupid court bought it

This is along the exact same vein as Trump‘s tax returns. Everyone knows the reason Trump doesn’t want to release them is because he has most likely found a crafty way to avoid paying a lot in taxes. Is he using an illegal way? Probably not, because I’m pretty sure he gets audited by the IRS often. It’s their job to find illegal tactics and their fault if they can’t

So he found a legal crafty way to pay far less taxes than maybe someone with his income should. Does that make him evil? No it makes him smart. This country is FUNDED on the backs of the rich. When you look at the amounts paid in taxes, the rich are carrying this fucking country on their backs, has been for years. When someone pays 39% of 5,000,000 that’s a SHITLOAD more money than middle class me paying 10% of my measly $55,000. Now is that most of their money? Hell no. Is it still more than anyone else is paying? Hell yes

So no, democrats are never going to convince a conservative like me that a rich person being crafty about avoiding getting fucked by taxes is evil. And I GUARANTEE there are countless rich dem politicians doing the same thing

[Gravydoo II]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok, turns out this was a lot shorter than I expected, so I read it

Sounds like the person who wrote this is bitter that Fox found a crafty way to escape a libel lawsuit. Do I agree with their tactics? Not completely, but I don’t know the circumstances of the libel lawsuit. If it was a really solid case, then Tucker should have just settled, it’s not like he can’t afford it. But that’s clearly all this was, a legal tactic to avoid a libel lawsuit. And apparently it worked, so bravo. And bring on the bitterness regarding the tactic. I guarantee you Fox doesn’t think Tucker Carlson is lying when he reports the news. They lied about not believing him, and the stupid court bought it

They said in court that if you believe this man you're a fucking idiot. Thats not a tactic. Thats now a precedent in law. This guy lies SO much, no reasonable person should believe him.

They are talking about their entire audience.

You dont see the problem?

[unsunghero]

Also, in regards to hunter Biden, that laptop had supposedly THOUSANDS of texts and emails regarding Burisma AND including Joe Biden, including what could be more evidence of a possible quid pro quo involving the firing the of the persons investigating Burisma financial interests. Yet because it was deemed “personal information” not offered by the owner, it wasn’t allowed to be reported on by social media

Yet when The NY Times got hold of Trump’s tax reports, taken without his permission, that shit was plastered all over liberal media and social media in less than 24 hours. Despite being categorically the same thing, personal information taken without permission

If liberals didn’t have double standards they’d have no standards at all

[Pulgasari]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

what could be more evidence of a possible

k.

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Pulgasari [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

k.

Yeah we shouldn’t be allowed to look and see, so guess we’ll never know. But we can spend millions of dollars on investigative teams who tear Trump, his family, and his entire campaign staff’s life apart when there’s speculation of a quid pro quo on his end

[Pulgasari]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah we shouldn’t be allowed to look and see, so guess we’ll never know. But we can spend millions of dollars on investigative teams who tear Trump, his family, and his entire campaign staff’s life apart when there’s speculation of a quid pro quo on his end

Hunter is a private citizen and thusly, off limits.

Trump made his kids part of the government.

That's the difference, dingus.

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Pulgasari [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hunter is a private citizen and thusly, off limits.

Trump made his kids part of the government.

That's the difference, dingus.

Once again, had Trump Jr been in the same position (just a private citizen), he would NOT have been off limits to the liberal media. I can promise you that. If you want live in a state of denial about how your media operates, that’s your choice. Not going to argue it further

[unsunghero]

Also, I find it funny the hypocrisy of this forum constantly deriding their members as drug addicts and using known substance use as a reason to attack them, then clutching their fucking pearls saying “how dare we speak critically about someone’s illegal HARD drug habits” later