Joke 6 Committee "Hearing"

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I do think you can argue that about ANTIFA. BLM probably too in terms of the actual legal entity/organization itself (not the movement overall)...the entity itself just grabbed the catchphrase people were using to try and raise money for its other initiatives, so I don't think every single person who says "BLM" is a terrorist.

So are you going to agree now that the people who stormed the capitol are domestic terrorists? Or were you just shitposting memes.

[Jibartik]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He got a two billion dollar investment from the Saudis for squashing Khashoggi heat, but keep fantasizing about killing the guy who beat your obese messianic figure you goddamn schizo.

Biden fist bumped him for the khashoggi kill.

the 1% got 6.5 trillion during biden.

Im sure kushner got more in 2021 than he got in 2019.

[robayon]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well before someone yells me, I'd like to say I see no reason to distinguish between Marxists, Post-Marxists, and posting-Marxists. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i don't think you're alone in that, the goofy chuds here would refer to libraries as 'communist'

so yeah i'm kinda used to people failing to make these distinctions, personally

not really relevant if it's deliberate or just ignorant, doesn't change much on my end

[cd288]

Originally Posted by MrSparkle001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you implying that they weren't still working on a nuke before Trump? Because that's the height of ignorance if so.

Sounds like you don't really follow the news. They had been originally working on a nuke. Pre-Trump there was then an agreement around denuclearization. When Trump became President, he pulled out of that agreement IIRC thereby freely allowing the Iranians to continue doing what they wanted to do with respect to developing nuclear weapons.

I'm not getting into the merits of his decision or the original agreement with Iran, just giving you the timeline.

[robayon]

warm bowl of soup take: i do not see why iran can't have nukes. sure they promised to incinerate israel or something, blah blah, but rattling the saber is as old as the hills

if anyone shouldn't have nukes it's america, the only country that's ever used them as weapons against other humans deliberately

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I do think you can argue that about ANTIFA. BLM probably too in terms of the actual legal entity/organization itself (not the movement overall)...the entity itself just grabbed the catchphrase people were using to try and raise money for its other initiatives, so I don't think every single person who says "BLM" is a terrorist.

So are you going to agree now that the people who stormed the capitol are domestic terrorists? Or were you just shitposting memes.

Im going to continue agreeing, yes. All terrorists.

[Jibartik]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sounds like you don't really follow the news. They had been originally working on a nuke. Pre-Trump there was then an agreement around denuclearization. When Trump became President, he pulled out of that agreement IIRC thereby freely allowing the Iranians to continue doing what they wanted to do with respect to developing nuclear weapons.

I'm not getting into the merits of his decision or the original agreement with Iran, just giving you the timeline.

IRAQ HAS NUKES WE MUST STOP THEM IRAQ HAS NUKES

[robayon]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Im going to continue agreeing, yes. All terrorists.

o7

[Jibartik]

You people are going to turn this country into this all the time:

[cd288]

Originally Posted by robayon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

warm bowl of soup take: i do not see why iran can't have nukes. sure they promised to incinerate israel or something, blah blah, but rattling the saber is as old as the hills

if anyone shouldn't have nukes it's america, the only country that's ever used them as weapons against other humans deliberately

Yeah I mean I can go both ways on it. I can understand the argument for why a country like Iran shouldn't have them