Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Green Community > Green Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-02-2019, 11:24 AM
Obrae Obrae is offline
Sarnak

Obrae's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalanmyr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Serious question. I'm not complaining. After looking into the mage research it looks like in order to get the lvl 44 mage pet you would have to have the level 39 pet, which requires the lvl 34 pet, which requires the lvl 29 pet etc.... If all of them are research after 20 that means you'd have to make the level 24 pet 9 times, the 29 pet 8 times the 34 pet 7 times etc.... In order to get your pet at every spell level.

Do I have this correct? That is a metric f*** ton of research if so.... Extremely disproportionate if true.
exact and possible the pet chain breaks at 34, and 39 may be non available cause no recipe exist for the 39 pets available at 34
__________________
Infernus Draconis
Magician
The Drift
  #2  
Old 11-02-2019, 11:28 AM
Kalanmyr Kalanmyr is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 52
Default

So I've been beaten down before for being anti-classic in favor of "classic+". I understand the objective of green. But what in the hell were the EQ devs thinking when they developed the mage spell path? I guess they were the last class to be developed, they ran out of funding and there was clearly some incompleteness at launch haha. I couldn't explain it any other way...

Glad I have 3 alts already that can overtake my level 18 mage before I'm in too deep lol...
  #3  
Old 11-02-2019, 11:31 AM
Bordar Bordar is offline
Aviak

Bordar's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 70
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalanmyr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So I've been beaten down before for being anti-classic in favor of "classic+". I understand the objective of green. But what in the hell were the EQ devs thinking when they developed the mage spell path? I guess they were the last class to be developed, they ran out of funding and there was clearly some incompleteness at launch haha. I couldn't explain it any other way...

Glad I have 3 alts already that can overtake my level 18 mage before I'm in too deep lol...
This might be bearable if the words and components dropped at the rates of other words.
  #4  
Old 11-02-2019, 11:51 AM
Obrae Obrae is offline
Sarnak

Obrae's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalanmyr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So I've been beaten down before for being anti-classic in favor of "classic+". I understand the objective of green. But what in the hell were the EQ devs thinking when they developed the mage spell path? I guess they were the last class to be developed, they ran out of funding and there was clearly some incompleteness at launch haha. I couldn't explain it any other way...

Glad I have 3 alts already that can overtake my level 18 mage before I'm in too deep lol...
Verant devs did confirmed the class was unfinished and their research.
__________________
Infernus Draconis
Magician
The Drift
  #5  
Old 11-02-2019, 12:00 PM
Kalanmyr Kalanmyr is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 52
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Obrae [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Verant devs did confirmed the class was unfinished and their research.
Really makes me question the need to put an unfinished class into green for the sake of "classic". At the very least I wish there was a comprehensive location on the p1999 site that you could easily digest important class-breaking things like this. If it exists please point me in that direction. Sucks you have to find out about things like this by either being extremely active and in-the-know as a contributor, or you have to wait until you read the forum and see people b***ing.

If you put an unfinished class in the game for sake of "classic", you should put all the bugs and coding errors in too! /s

*sigh* +1 for Classic+
  #6  
Old 11-02-2019, 12:40 PM
Jimjam Jimjam is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,719
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalanmyr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So I've been beaten down before for being anti-classic in favor of "classic+". I understand the objective of green. But what in the hell were the EQ devs thinking when they developed the mage spell path? I guess they were the last class to be developed, they ran out of funding and there was clearly some incompleteness at launch haha. I couldn't explain it any other way...

Glad I have 3 alts already that can overtake my level 18 mage before I'm in too deep lol...
The 'upgrade the old spell' is cool conceptually, and it wouldn't be so bad if the required components were more easily accessible. At 20ish just make a bunch of 20 pets and bank the scrolls, 24 upgrade those, etc as you go. Spell scrolls being stackable would help to.

At least the farming for rare component is good training for epic later.
  #7  
Old 11-02-2019, 12:01 PM
Ligma Ligma is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 181
Default

Every expansion was unfinished. It's part of the timeline
  #8  
Old 11-02-2019, 12:31 PM
hillgiantchamp hillgiantchamp is offline
Fire Giant

hillgiantchamp's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 579
Default

I'm pretty upset aswell. I leveled a mage to 40 on beta and had the normal pet's I could obtain from vendors. They should have at least let us know that this was going to be the case on green before so many people rolled mage and waisted their time. There where plenty of forum posts on the topic they could have at least replied to one of them.
  #9  
Old 11-02-2019, 12:42 PM
Kalanmyr Kalanmyr is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 52
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hillgiantchamp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm pretty upset aswell. I leveled a mage to 40 on beta and had the normal pet's I could obtain from vendors. They should have at least let us know that this was going to be the case on green before so many people rolled mage and waisted their time. There where plenty of forum posts on the topic they could have at least replied to one of them.
Yeah I agree. I'm not on the forums much, but when I was... most questions were met with radio silence prior to launch. There was a extremely tiny compilation on the wiki for quotes from devs on like 5 launch subjects. Nothing comprehensive like the Blue patch notes. If they wanna go this route that's fine, but communication would have been appreciated.

A week in I feel like I wasted a bunch of time.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The 'upgrade the old spell' is cool conceptually, and it wouldn't be so bad if the required components were more easily accessible. At 20ish just make a bunch of 20 pets and bank the scrolls, 24 upgrade those, etc as you go. Spell scrolls being stackable would help to.

At least the farming for rare component is good training for epic later.
I'm not saying it's not. I'm more worried about what was said earlier that the level 30 something pet spell doesn't even exist and the pet chain breaks at this point until it is patched later.
Last edited by Kalanmyr; 11-02-2019 at 12:44 PM..
  #10  
Old 11-02-2019, 12:44 PM
deezy deezy is offline
Sarnak

deezy's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 464
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kalanmyr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
A week in I feel like I wasted a bunch of time.
lol
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:48 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.