Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-19-2021, 11:42 PM
Horza Horza is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,666
Default

You can't complain about partisanship, quote someone who writes for pedo garbage like the Federalist and then get mad when people call you a hypocrite.

The Federalist earned scorching pushback on social media Thursday after it published an opinion piece defending Alabama GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore dating teenagers while in his 30s on the grounds that it's "not without some merit if one wants to raise a large family."
  #2  
Old 05-19-2021, 11:47 PM
unsunghero unsunghero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 8,328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Oh I’m sorry that your news media doesn’t ever cover anything that would remotely look bad for the institutions that align with their politics

How’s that hunter Biden smoking meth with escorts story developing on CNN? Think that would have stayed off the air if it was Trump Jr? Remember when social media actually BANNED all hunter Biden stories before the election? Oh but that’s not meddling and I’m sure they would have done it for Trump Jr as well. I mean, it’s unethical to show people’s personal information that they didn’t release. Unless it’s supposedly Trump’s stolen tax reports. Then SHARE THAT SHIT YO!

You are a moron if you can’t see how SPLC is partisan
  #3  
Old 05-19-2021, 11:51 PM
Gravydoo II Gravydoo II is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 2,344
Default

Some times a fact is a fact. It doesnt matter if donald trump or hillary clinton points at a flat tire and says "thats a flat tire". Its simply not possible for someone to report facts? Nobody is capable of this feat, unless you agree with them.

Thats the difference. Ive been wrong, ill admit it and change my mind.

Republicans wont. Never admit they are wrong. Never research a position, never change their minds.

Then they point at a retraction from a news organization and say "AHA! I knew it!" meanwhile, their "news" organizations are in court saying "we're not responsible for the lies we tell because no reasonable person would believe tucker carlson." and there you have it.

Look it up. https://blogs.findlaw.com/greedy_ass...ing-facts.html
  #4  
Old 05-19-2021, 11:54 PM
Gravydoo II Gravydoo II is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 2,344
Default

Hunter biden is not a public figure. Hunter Biden is not involved in the biden admin, like the trump kids were. Sorry. You just want to attack a private citizen for struggling with a drug addiction. What the fuck is wrong with you?
  #5  
Old 05-19-2021, 11:57 PM
unsunghero unsunghero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 8,328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gravydoo II [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hunter biden is not a public figure. Hunter Biden is not involved in the biden admin, like the trump kids were. Sorry. You just want to attack a private citizen for struggling with a drug addiction. What the fuck is wrong with you?
Because being a president is about fucking CHARACTER. Ever seen an unmarried president with no kids? Ever? Ever once? Why is that I wonder? Because the country uses a president’s family as a representation of their character

And when you have one of your kids exposing themselves to underage escorts while smoking meth that’s a reflection of how you raised them. That’s not even including the Burisma quid pro quo scandals, which Biden has direct involvement in
  #6  
Old 05-20-2021, 12:12 AM
Pulgasari Pulgasari is offline
Planar Protector

Pulgasari's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Because being a president is about fucking CHARACTER. Ever seen an unmarried president with no kids? Ever? Ever once? Why is that I wonder? Because the country uses a president’s family as a representation of their character

And when you have one of your kids exposing themselves to underage escorts while smoking meth that’s a reflection of how you raised them. That’s not even including the Burisma quid pro quo scandals, which Biden has direct involvement in
https://www.history.com/news/not-eve...-the-president
  #7  
Old 05-20-2021, 12:23 AM
unsunghero unsunghero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 8,328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pulgasari [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lol k. It’s EXCEEDINGLY rare. Why? Because like I said the country uses a president’s wife and kids as a reflection of their character, and because of that, there is some mistrust of any candidate who is single without kids

Now I agree with the first part, but not the second part, being someone who is unmarried without kids. That alone should not be seen as a negative yet in politics it seems to be
  #8  
Old 05-20-2021, 12:41 AM
Pulgasari Pulgasari is offline
Planar Protector

Pulgasari's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,459
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Lol k. It’s EXCEEDINGLY rare. Why? Because like I said the country uses a president’s wife and kids as a reflection of their character, and because of that, there is some mistrust of any candidate who is single without kids

Now I agree with the first part, but not the second part, being someone who is unmarried without kids. That alone should not be seen as a negative yet in politics it seems to be
Exceedingly? 9 out of 46?
  #9  
Old 05-19-2021, 11:55 PM
Horza Horza is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 4,666
Default

Nobody gives a shit about Hunter Biden, but lol

Until October 2017, The Federalist had a "black crime" tag, which aggregated articles related to criminal activity by African Americans. Dan McLaughlin of National Review, a former Federalist contributor, said that the phrasing of the "black crime" tag was "unfortunate," that when he had written for The Federalist he had "never even noticed that there were tags at the bottom of my essays," and that The Federalist "had deleted the tag as soon as it attracted any notice—over a couple of years the tag appeared on only five or six posts."
  #10  
Old 05-20-2021, 12:01 AM
unsunghero unsunghero is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 8,328
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Nobody gives a shit about Hunter Biden, but lol

Until October 2017, The Federalist had a "black crime" tag, which aggregated articles related to criminal activity by African Americans. Dan McLaughlin of National Review, a former Federalist contributor, said that the phrasing of the "black crime" tag was "unfortunate," that when he had written for The Federalist he had "never even noticed that there were tags at the bottom of my essays," and that The Federalist "had deleted the tag as soon as it attracted any notice—over a couple of years the tag appeared on only five or six posts."
Oh no, let’s not use statistics as a statement about culture in our newspaper

Remember, the fact that there are higher rates of black people arrested for violent crimes than white people when normalized for population size is only due to systemic racism

Just like the fact that there are 10 times as many men arrested for violence as women is only due to systemic sexism and nothing about the cultural component of masculinity
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:18 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.