Sirken

[Buhbuh]

sirken is innocent

[Nizzarr]

isnt sirken the kid that got played by derubael?

just wondering if were talking about the same guy here

[Zemgus]

Originally Posted by Nizzarr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

isnt sirken the kid that got played by derubael?

just wondering if were talking about the same guy here

Sabres 10 game win streak, how bout them habs

[Oleris]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Swish2]

Nobody got banned for saying bad words about Derubael, did they? (justified or not)

Just some perspective.

[dcrag]

Posted that before Rogeans response - looks like we just need some clarification on what staff bashing is, like name calling, doxxing, etc I understand. But we should be able to talk about it without a ban.

[Rogean]

Originally Posted by dcrag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Posted that before Rogeans response - looks like we just need some clarification on what staff bashing is, like name calling, doxxing, etc I understand. But we should be able to talk about it without a ban.

It shouldn't really need too much explanation. There's a respectful way to convey an opinion, and there's being a shitbag.

Subtle / passive aggressive comments are often more likely to get disciplined than being directly insulted as well, but again each depends on severity. People who imply favoritism usually do the former. Both are unacceptable.

Personally, I could care less what people say about me, and I've been that way for years. You could call me a piece of shit and I'll just laugh, but then some other staffer will most likely take action ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

[MXC]

[QUOTE=Rogean;2816900It shouldn't really need too much explanation. There's a respectful way to convey an opinion, and there's being a shitbag.

Subtle / passive aggressive comments are often more likely to get disciplined than being directly insulted as well, but again each depends on severity. People who imply favoritism usually do the former. Both are unacceptable.

Personally, I could care less what people say about me, and I've been that way for years. You could call me a piece of shit and I'll just laugh, but then some other staffer will most likely take action ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.[/QUOTE]

Sirken has been giving items and information to priviledged few, at what point does implying favortism cross the threshold of being unacceptable when its been proven true?

[Rogean]

Originally Posted by MXC [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sirken has been giving items and information to priviledged few, at what point does implying favortism cross the threshold of being unacceptable when its been proven true?

I don't even know where to start with the stupidity in this response.

I actually had a decent reply lined up but you know it's not even worth trying to argue with someone who obviously has absolutely no capacity to look at something objectively.

Continue believing everything you read from Reddit. I will continue to investigate my staff according to correlative evidence provided (Or, in this case, found on an external website because nobody cares to actually send that evidence to management before posting it for the whole internet).

And stop Staff Bashing.

[MXC]

[QUOTE=Rogean;2816900It shouldn't really need too much explanation. There's a respectful way to convey an opinion, and there's being a shitbag.

Subtle / passive aggressive comments are often more likely to get disciplined than being directly insulted as well, but again each depends on severity. People who imply favoritism usually do the former. Both are unacceptable.

Personally, I could care less what people say about me, and I've been that way for years. You could call me a piece of shit and I'll just laugh, but then some other staffer will most likely take action ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.[/QUOTE]

Sirken has been giving items and information to priviledged few, at what point does implying favortism cross the threshold of being unacceptable when its been proven true??