Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-24-2017, 01:42 PM
Heebs13 Heebs13 is offline
Kobold

Heebs13's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phenyo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This would get old real quick
I posted before they should increase the loot of each boss to drop 4 or 5 pieces per kill, but the bosses should all be rooted in place and the adds should leash to the boss if not killed, therefore forcing the bosses to be killed in their lairs after clearing to them, as the devs intended. The idea should be to ensure you get the same amount of loot for the same amount of time put in, but you do it killing significantly fewer bosses. Bonus, you get rid of all the stupid giant trains that always end up resulting in players getting killed accidentally, and 90% of your raid staring at a wall while the pullers do all the work.

If that would get old real quick, what are we even doing playing EQ?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen View Post
P99ers do a lot of things well. Handling surprise adds / splitting up focus is not one of them. Mostly because the classes that do that the best (SK/Paladins) are generally trashed and considered useless, and because pulls are considered failures if a dragons doesn't appear at the zone line solo.
  #2  
Old 12-24-2017, 02:03 PM
Pokesan Pokesan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,958
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phenyo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This would get old real quick
people who don't like raiding shouldn't raid
  #3  
Old 12-25-2017, 12:00 AM
Fasttimes Fasttimes is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 401
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gundumbwing [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Holy shit this thread is great, especially Cecily completely melting down and showing her true nature. Priceless.

Only facts that matter - raid rules existed. A PUG breaks the rules. A PUG gets punished.

Doesnt even matter if it was accidental or on purpose. But continue to tell the judge "I was drunk driving, it's not my fault Lady N was using the crosswalk!". I'm sure it'll make sense the more you say it.
holy shit look at this melt, priceless.
  #4  
Old 12-25-2017, 12:01 AM
skarlorn skarlorn is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: The Misty Thicket
Posts: 4,863
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fasttimes [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
holy shit look at this melt, priceless.
Ya gdwing posting is next level 2day
  #5  
Old 12-26-2017, 02:52 PM
Nexii Nexii is offline
Sarnak

Nexii's Avatar

Join Date: May 2015
Location: Neriak Third Gate
Posts: 447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ths glory that would unfold if they removed the 2 fracker rule. You'd have 200 neckbeards huddled in Vulaks room during his window and they'd keep the 6 Drakes down, all while spam clicking Vulak's spawn point. Send out some DA runners to clear paths to Lords and Ladies as they spawn and single pull dragons back onto the bridge to kill them.

At least then the entrance may be safe.
I think the no camping out on bosses rule has to stay. The meta shouldn't be who has the best autofire macro and/or ping.
  #6  
Old 12-26-2017, 04:07 PM
Argh Argh is offline
Planar Protector

Argh's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexii [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The tracker FTE rule would have barely made sense in Kunark let alone Velious.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexii [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think the no camping out on bosses rule has to stay.
It's the same rule, and it made plenty of sense during Kunark.
  #7  
Old 12-26-2017, 04:39 PM
Nexii Nexii is offline
Sarnak

Nexii's Avatar

Join Date: May 2015
Location: Neriak Third Gate
Posts: 447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Argh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It's the same rule, and it made plenty of sense during Kunark.
How would it have made sense? You can't even exp in a zone like Sebilis or KC while a boss is in window or your guild is permanently DQed when it pops? Even if you all zone out and join the raid starting at the zone line? What new player is going to intuitively understand this?

No, it was stupid. It was a hacked around way of solving a problem. The problem being that variance on a per-mob basis was a bad design idea from the outset, and there weren't programmatic ways of solving the issue.

The tracker rule and no camping on bosses aren't the same rule. You could have zero trackers allowed and force players back to the zone in upon repop. Tracking shouldn't even be a thing, as its equivalent to socking.
  #8  
Old 12-26-2017, 04:54 PM
Argh Argh is offline
Planar Protector

Argh's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,166
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nexii [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The tracker rule and no camping on bosses aren't the same rule.
It is, literally, the same rule.

Quote:
Guilds may not have any more than two representatives present at a raid spawn location.
via raid.php

GMs have just further clarified this rule to expand what a raid spawn location is to basically everything except the zoneline. Through Rogean's clarification, and suspensions to BDA and Lord Bob
  #9  
Old 12-26-2017, 04:58 PM
Nexii Nexii is offline
Sarnak

Nexii's Avatar

Join Date: May 2015
Location: Neriak Third Gate
Posts: 447
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Argh [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It is, literally, the same rule.



via raid.php

GMs have just further clarified this rule to expand what a raid spawn location is to basically everything except the zoneline. Through Rogean's clarification, and suspensions to BDA and Lord Bob
I'm saying you can have a 'no camping on bosses' rule and not allow trackers. Is that hard to understand?

Regardless none of this would exist with variance eliminated in place of quakes & automated succor. No reason not to, aside from the minor disruption to players in the zone. But with advance warning I don't see it as a big deal. Most players on quake are going to be doing something other than exping even in a casual guild.
  #10  
Old 12-26-2017, 02:54 PM
Erati Erati is offline
Planar Protector

Erati's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daldaen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Ths glory that would unfold if they removed the 2 fracker rule. You'd have 200 neckbeards huddled in Vulaks room during his window and they'd keep the 6 Drakes down, all while spam clicking Vulak's spawn point. Send out some DA runners to clear paths to Lords and Ladies as they spawn and single pull dragons back onto the bridge to kill them.

At least then the entrance may be safe.
If anyone ruins EQ its this guy ^ we should make a thread about everything hes ruined on p99!

ill start...

Dald is responsible for everyone forced to EQUIP their PoM flowers just to use. WHY!!
__________________
Eratani / Cleratani / Eratou / Stabatani / Flopatani / Eratii
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:56 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.