Victim disarmament zones

[Rellapse35]

Try and take the guns away from the rednecks and see what happens lulz

[runlvlzero]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The point is you can't ban the guns or get them off the streets. You gonna do door to door collections like the Nazis? America already saw two peaceful revolutions in the past 4 years (Tea Party and Occupy), can you imagine an act of war? You know what kicked off the original American revolution? Why were the British at Lexington and Concord? That's right: take the guns away.

This is why the people even thinking of asking for guns are the most Amoral in their disregard for their fellows. If people aren't suffering in droves now. And they know there are better alternative ways to alleviate suffering in this country.

Yet their priorities are to target individuals with guns with force.

Sure thats DEFINITELY not going to result in more suffering.

Thats about as logical and rational as I can get.

And why I am sure there is some horrendous conspiracy when the media disregards peaceful protests from Patriotic bikers in DC, yet slams this stuff all over the TV tubes.

http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/09/11/...to-washington/ That is how you keep your Republic strong folks.

[aowen]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The point is you can't ban the guns or get them off the streets. You gonna do door to door collections like the Nazis? America already saw two peaceful revolutions in the past 4 years (Tea Party and Occupy), can you imagine an act of war? You know what kicked off the original American revolution? Why were the British at Lexington and Concord? That's right: take the guns away.

Occupy and Tea Party stuff were not revolutions. Do you understand what a protest is? Occupy was a worldwide protests, they had people at St. Paul's in London too, and it wasn't even all aimed at governments, it was also aimed at corporatism.

The rest of what you said is too retarded and irrelevant for me to even waste my time talking about the American revolution.

[r00t]

Originally Posted by aowen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Occupy and Tea Party stuff were not revolutions. Do you understand what a protest is? Occupy was a worldwide protests, they had people at St. Paul's in London too, and it wasn't even all aimed at governments, it was also aimed at corporatism.

The rest of what you said is too retarded and irrelevant for me to even waste my time talking about the American revolution.

The Battles of Lexington and Concord were the first military engagements of the American Revolutionary War.[9][10] About 700 British Army regulars, under Lieutenant Colonel Francis Smith, were given secret orders to capture and destroy military supplies that were reportedly stored by the Massachusetts militia at Concord. Through effective intelligence gathering, Patriot colonials had received word weeks before the expedition that their supplies might be at risk and had moved most of them to other locations.

[aowen]

Originally Posted by r00t [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The Battles of Lexington and Concord were the first military engagements of the American Revolutionary War.[9][10] About 700 British Army regulars, under Lieutenant Colonel Francis Smith, were given secret orders to capture and destroy military supplies that were reportedly stored by the Massachusetts militia at Concord. Through effective intelligence gathering, Patriot colonials had received word weeks before the expedition that their supplies might be at risk and had moved most of them to other locations.

I have extensive knowledge of the American revolution. I know the British were there to take their weapons supplies. That doesn't mean it has anything to do with what is going on now, or has even 1 iota of validity as a comparison.

[Rellapse35]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Su1S29FO_5w

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by aowen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have extensive knowledge of the American revolution. I know the British were there to take their weapons supplies. That doesn't mean it has anything to do with what is going on now, or has even 1 iota of validity as a comparison.

Past history of taking guns away has no validity when discussing the possibility of taking guns away? You have a strange notion of validity.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by aowen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Occupy and Tea Party stuff were not revolutions. Do you understand what a protest is? Occupy was a worldwide protests, they had people at St. Paul's in London too, and it wasn't even all aimed at governments, it was also aimed at corporatism.

The rest of what you said is too retarded and irrelevant for me to even waste my time talking about the American revolution.

Actually, I'm pretty sure most of the occupy movement was just dudes looking to pick up chicks.

[runlvlzero]

Not by creating more and more waco like incidents and running MK ultra on victims of 911

[r00t]

Please tell me how you're gonna get the guns out of our hands, redcoat