![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
Quote:
The answer is people /pet attack a single mob and record the DPS. You can do that in a group, or solo[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] This is how DPS parsing works for class comparisons. Quote:
__________________
| ||||
|
#2
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Please explain in detail how "the DPS will remain the same" in a group environment when "the DPS equation has been changed by outside variables" as you noted in the - direct- Quote(s) below? Quote:
Quote:
| |||||
|
#3
|
||||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
"You were right. I'm sorry"
This is a simple sentence, DSM. You're a big man, right? | ||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
You still haven't answered my question: If a Mage does 20 DPS in a group because the puller keeps killing their pet, and a Shaman does 50 DPS because they aren't relying on their pet for DPS, does that mean a Mage has lower DPS than a Shaman?
__________________
| |||
|
#6
|
|||||||||
|
Quote:
Again I will ask: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||||||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
I already showed how your gaslighting of my comments is incorrect and poorly executed https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=4165 . You aren't making your case any stronger by constant reposting those quotes. It just makes you look silly.
__________________
| |||
|
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 06-29-2023 at 01:47 PM..
| ||||
|
#8
|
||||||||
|
Quote:
Are you low-key insinuating that you have refused to provide parses of yourself playing your Shaman in an environment relevant to this thread, simply because, you are afraid that might expose that you as a PLAYER simply CANNOT perform as you have fervently/adamantly argued that THE SHAMAN CLASS can; and possibly even NO PLAYER can perform on the Shaman class in the way you have fervently/adamantly argued it that could for tens? hundreds of posts? Does this all basically boil down to You vs. Everyone "comparing Apples to Oranges" simply because you are choosing to act like there will be NO players actually piloting the characters in this hypothetical group - which is an unrealistic and laughable specification for you to attempt to apply to the conversation when OP did NOT specify any - is that what's going on here? Can you please explain for the understanding of myself and the rest of the posters/participants and passersby who read this thread and for the sake of civil discussion, why/how the following - direct - Quotes are "not contradictory"? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||||||
|
Last edited by cyxthryth; 06-29-2023 at 01:53 PM..
| ||||||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
If my detractors want to actually group up and get video recorded with me, that would be great! This would really be the only way to actually prove this one way or another, because neither party can make excuses if they are both present in the group. So far nobody has seriously taken up this offer. I am responding to you for the sake of people who haven't read this thread, not because you are saying anything new. It is clear you are trolling, just as you have been for the last 300+ posts.
__________________
| |||
|
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 06-29-2023 at 02:03 PM..
| ||||
|
#10
|
||||||||
|
Quote:
Does this all basically boil down to You vs. Everyone "comparing Apples to Oranges" simply because you are choosing to act like there will be NO players actually piloting the characters in this hypothetical group - which is an unrealistic and laughable specification for you to attempt to apply to the conversation when OP did NOT specify any - is that what's going on here? Can you please explain - in detail - for the understanding of myself and the rest of the posters/participants and passersby who read this thread and for the sake of civil discussion, why/how the following - direct - Quotes are "not contradictory"? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| |||||||
![]() |
|
|