Shadow knight aggro

[Snaggles]

Originally Posted by Ripqozko [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Idk since I cast only 2 clinging in most teams less someone is super anxious to rip aggro. I don’t have issues and if it’s a longer harder mob I usually have mana for the other stuff cause buffs.

Edit I also have tuna sword tho so I get root proc and good white dmg.

Yea plus the root dynamic.

I might have to try out SV vs Clinging sometimes with the derves in in WC.

You do bring up a good point. Having a really solid ratio 2h between casts gives far more swing aggro than a 1h. I do use 1h on occasion but you have to work harder for that same threat. At scout once another pally sent a tell asking how I held aggro over him trying to peel. It was the Rocksmasher vs the epic.

[Vivitron]

Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yea plus the root dynamic.

I might have to try out SV vs Clinging sometimes with the derves in in WC.

You do bring up a good point. Having a really solid ratio 2h between casts gives far more swing aggro than a 1h. I do use 1h on occasion but you have to work harder for that same threat. At scout once another pally sent a tell asking how I held aggro over him trying to peel. It was the Rocksmasher vs the epic.

Another piece of the resent patch is these spells aggro scales on the hp of the target up to a cap, so be prepared to be disappointed on the dervs compared to white aggro.

[Snaggles]

Originally Posted by Vivitron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Another piece of the resent patch is these spells aggro scales on the hp of the target up to a cap, so be prepared to be disappointed on the dervs compared to white aggro.

I dont see why this wouldnt work:

Derv A: Shaman casts 10 slows, SK casts __# of SV's until it rips.
Derv B: Shaman casts 10 slows, SK casts __# of Clinging's until it rips.

Or someone else can figure it out. I dont group or raid with my sk.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Guesty07 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What an idiot. Guy really said spamming taunt is BETTER than using it appropriately ROFL

We got ourselves another DSM thread.

Lol.

30+ pages of extra horse shit since I last posted.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We got ourselves another DSM thread.

Lol.

30+ pages of extra horse shit since I last posted.

Why bother posting this? You haven't disproven anything I have said, and you look like a troll at the same time. You're doing yourself and the community zero favors. You're also not hurting me. Keep this in RnF please.

[Troxx]

Lol this is my first post since page 2. The last 32 pages has been all you man.

Congrats on ruining another thread.

Spamming taunt when you’re at the top of the threat list is stupid.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol this is my first post since page 2. The last 32 pages has been all you man.

Congrats on ruining another thread.

Spamming taunt when you’re at the top of the threat list is stupid.

Saying something is stupid is not an arguement. Come back when you have an argument. I am sorry you think having a discussion is a problem on a forum.

Troll posts like this are the only problem here.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I understand this button is a lot less crucial for knights but damn … this isn’t rocket surgery. If you’re already at the top of the aggro list, it does nothing. If you constantly spam it there’s a one in six chance you won’t have it up the instant you need it most … with a 1-5 second wait before you can use it again. If it fails the first time, you now have a 7-11 second wait for the second taunt instead of a faster 6 second 2nd attempt.

That’s why it is stupid.

I stated the “why” 32 pages ago. Regardless, no amount of logic or reason will ever convince you of anything once you have dug in a position. Heck, we’ve since had 32 pages of people trying.

This is the perfect example of a “DSM Thread”.

This is a weird hill to die on. Arguably your stupidest ever … and that is saying a lot.

[Penish]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why bother posting this? You haven't disproven anything I have said, and you look like a troll at the same time. You're doing yourself and the community zero favors. You're also not hurting me. Keep this in RnF please.

literally 25 or so people have disproven you in this thread, congrats retard

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That’s why it is stupid.

I stated the “why” 32 pages ago. Regardless, no amount of logic or reason will ever convince you of anything once you have dug in a position. Heck, we’ve since had 32 pages of people trying.

This is the perfect example of a “DSM Thread”.

This is a weird hill to die on. Arguably your stupidest ever … and that is saying a lot.

I already factually disproved all of the arguments you made on page 2 here: https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=140

What else do you have argument-wise? So far "you are stupid" is all you have, which is irrelevant.