Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #321  
Old 10-11-2017, 11:42 AM
Spyder73 Spyder73 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: 36th Chamber
Posts: 1,901
Default

Just tread carefully or you are going to end up in applesauce25r624's signature
  #322  
Old 10-11-2017, 11:43 AM
indiscriminate_hater indiscriminate_hater is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,758
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #323  
Old 10-11-2017, 11:58 AM
orangemang orangemang is offline
Orc


Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 45
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Droog007 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh we're totally broken up. It's not me, it's him.
Omg yes. The delicious salt!! I need more!
  #324  
Old 10-11-2017, 12:04 PM
Heebs13 Heebs13 is offline
Kobold

Heebs13's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by indiscriminate_hater [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Like War Games, the only winning move is not to play.
  #325  
Old 10-11-2017, 12:15 PM
Dreenk317 Dreenk317 is offline
Fire Giant

Dreenk317's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Droog007 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Good lord man, now you're defending my wife from her evil abusive husband? This is really the last time I'm going to respond to YOU. You have proven over and over again that you are unwilling to look at this through a clear lens. None of my statements are contradictory no matter how you may wish it were so.

I have posted logs as requested, and told you guys hit by hit what was going through our heads and what we saw on our screens to the absolute best of our collective memory. Let's see some logs from the other side that maybe prove Mana's claim that the gnoll was down to 20% when charm landed... someone's telling some tall tales in BG channels, eh?

I have played this game on and off since July of 1999. I was never in a top raiding guild or anything, but I learned a lot of stuff. I do feel pretty knowledgeable about the game of EQ. The way things go down on P99 still surprise me from time to time - I will grant you that.

Now, for the counterpoints:

Can you read what you just typed? She didn't know, but she had a theory. Her theory proved incorrect after she got more information that was not immediately available to her in the first few seconds of the mob's lifetime at ~195 units.

No, man. God. Tash is in, and now she knows people are meleeing it. She makes the wrong choice on the follow-up, and quickly changes course.

Basically admits... you really want us to self-incriminate... just SO badly. That is not what she's saying. She is letting me know that we're being harassed rather than merely heckled. Tash was the spell she "FTE raced" (lol) with... TASH! NOT CHARM! TASH!


I never said that the mob ran away from her after tash landed. I thought she said that it ran toward her, but I can't be 100% certain of that. She said it was only after tash landed that she saw melee action. I think maybe she ran toward the mob after tash, which goes toward a previous poster's question about the 7s between tash and mez. None of this proves FTE for either party. From her vantage, she might have had FTE, and she wasn't even thinking she needed it. She was operating under the idea that we had a claim to that mob based on timeliness. Also, aggro is aggro. Distance plays a factor. The order in which chunks of aggro are applied - not so much. You're going to tell me that she should have known immediately who had FTE while considering dozens of factors... who's throwing her under the bus, again?
I'm sorry you don't know what contradict means, and I'll admit, depending on who "them" is in context to your wife's statement about grizzlin running towards "them". Maybe he didn't run away from her after tash, though usually people use "me" to refer themselves, and "them" to refer to a group of other people.
Also, I'm sorry you put me on ignore, because you won't get to see this great little gem.

http://agricultural.dominionsalt.co....se-187x300.jpg

Totally real^^
  #326  
Old 10-11-2017, 12:23 PM
Manasana2 Manasana2 is offline
Skeleton


Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 15
Default

Lets all be honest for a second.... this had nothing to do with Lodi it was the fact that near the end of my AG career I called out grizluk on some things before I left. Sure it was out of anger when I did it but its over and done with... the only reason he posted this Hilarious ass thead to try and make BG look bad. this was simply to attack ME.... AG has almost if not EVER posted threads on this RNF.. so tell me is it a coincidence an old AG officer that I know is upset with me decides to make a thread only 2 months into my New guild.... I think not and on top of that AG was the ones that clearly fucked up. then throwing your wife under the bus lol come on griz!!!! you cant change your story many times and expect us all to read it as facts...I know AG pushes to follow and to not break any rules so I do think this was a simple mistake on AGs part... but dont you dare try to dump this on BG like a dick with a RNF you clearly Lost
  #327  
Old 10-11-2017, 12:32 PM
Dreenk317 Dreenk317 is offline
Fire Giant

Dreenk317's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Droog007 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're going to tell me that she should have known immediately who had FTE while considering dozens of factors... who's throwing her under the bus, again?
You. You are throwing her under the bus.
  #328  
Old 10-11-2017, 12:42 PM
Zemus Zemus is offline
Sarnak

Zemus's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 327
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
  #329  
Old 10-11-2017, 12:45 PM
Dreenk317 Dreenk317 is offline
Fire Giant

Dreenk317's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 699
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gundumbwing [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you really are the guild leader, I can see why your guild is full of scum.

Guild members can run wild when their leader is delusional with a high opinion of themselves.

On a side note, I think it should be brought up that BG shouldn't be acting high and mighty in this thread. Sirken depopped the mob because both parties were in the wrong. Both. My guess is sirken was disgusted with BG going 100% against the play nice policy with scummy instant petitioning tactics.
As i said, way back on like page 4, I think sirken came to a very fair ruling, neither side got anything, then AG came here because they felt that wasnt fair. And you clearly dont know many people from BG, lots of very stand up players there, mana included, just like in AG, but every tree has some bad apples.
  #330  
Old 10-11-2017, 12:50 PM
Manasana2 Manasana2 is offline
Skeleton


Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 15
Default

Delusional of what. I looked at all the data from my members and the GMs responses... BG did not break any rules and the GM even said it... yet AG confirmed broke rules and the Gm despawned it. its a stupid lodi and a joke of a RNF thread there is no High and mighty. you bold BOTH parties like BG had lodi or something... we simply using tactics and strategy to decrease the AG duos success rate. again its not the first person/persons to get FTE its the first to kill it. Do you think AG would have started this thread on any other guild I think not..
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.