Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-25-2014, 10:34 AM
Sidelle Sidelle is offline
Planar Protector

Sidelle's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: FEMA FUN CAMP (zone III)
Posts: 1,078
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Sidelle SUNRISE - 60 Wood Elf Assassin | Zhalara BLACKTHORN - 33 Wood Elf Druid
(Song of the day... week... month... whatever...) Sober -- TOOL
Q - WE ARE THE PLAN (The Great Awakening)
  #2  
Old 11-25-2014, 11:50 AM
feanan feanan is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 423
Default

Mad much?

Grand jury heard a lot more evidence and eyewitness testimony than anyone in this thread.
  #3  
Old 11-25-2014, 12:09 PM
Portasaurus Portasaurus is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,477
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by feanan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Grand jury heard a lot more evidence and eyewitness testimony than anyone in this thread.
That's kind of exactly the problem.

A lot of other cases get the public eye. Doing it behind closed doors like this is a GREAT WAY to fuel the rage and conspiracy theories.

"Good job, idiots" is really all I have to say today.
  #4  
Old 11-25-2014, 12:21 PM
Duckwalk Duckwalk is offline
Sarnak

Duckwalk's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Portasaurus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That's kind of exactly the problem.

A lot of other cases get the public eye. Doing it behind closed doors like this is a GREAT WAY to fuel the rage and conspiracy theories.

"Good job, idiots" is really all I have to say today.
Exactly. Officer Wilsonmay very well be innocent but he should be found so in a court of law not a back room where only Prosecutor is allowed and in this case he's feeding them potentially exculpatory evidence instead of trying for an indictment.
  #5  
Old 11-25-2014, 12:27 PM
DetroitVelvetSmooth DetroitVelvetSmooth is offline
Sarnak

DetroitVelvetSmooth's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Portasaurus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"Good job, idiots" is really all I have to say today.
__________________
I apologize for the prior sig gif. Here are some kittens.
  #6  
Old 11-25-2014, 12:18 PM
Duckwalk Duckwalk is offline
Sarnak

Duckwalk's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 351
Default

It is very rare for prosecutors fail to secure indictments. But you're right, the Grand Jury did hear a lot more evidence than the public.

However, because the burden of proof is so low and the are more than enough public allegations / evidence to support such a burden they would basically need to be able to show beyond a reasonable doubt or at clear and convincingly that no wrong doing occured which is very unlikely.

Much more likely is the fact that the DAs office has a vested interest in not prosecuting local police whom they work closely with or the grand jury, technically drawn from a pool of registered voters (but most often the DAs golfing buddies) disn't want to indict a police officer.

See recent Houston Chronicle investigation into this very issue at http://m.chron.com/local/investigati...rt-1-24419.php
  #7  
Old 11-25-2014, 12:29 PM
DetroitVelvetSmooth DetroitVelvetSmooth is offline
Sarnak

DetroitVelvetSmooth's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duckwalk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It is very rare for prosecutors fail to secure indictments. But you're right, the Grand Jury did hear a lot more evidence than the public.

However, because the burden of proof is so low and the are more than enough public allegations / evidence to support such a burden they would basically need to be able to show beyond a reasonable doubt or at clear and convincingly that no wrong doing occured which is very unlikely.

Much more likely is the fact that the DAs office has a vested interest in not prosecuting local police whom they work closely with or the grand jury, technically drawn from a pool of registered voters (but most often the DAs golfing buddies) disn't want to indict a police officer.

See recent Houston Chronicle investigation into this very issue at http://m.chron.com/local/investigati...rt-1-24419.php
Bingo - even in instances where they have hard evidence of wrong doing prosecutors will frequently let the police off the hook on general principle. What did you think this was about, justice?
__________________
I apologize for the prior sig gif. Here are some kittens.
  #8  
Old 11-25-2014, 12:34 PM
Duckwalk Duckwalk is offline
Sarnak

Duckwalk's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DetroitVelvetSmooth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Bingo - even in instances where they have hard evidence of wrong doing prosecutors will frequently let the police off the hook on general principle. What did you think this was about, justice?
Just pointing out Furgeson citizens have every right to be mad not that I'm encouraging rioting.
  #9  
Old 11-25-2014, 12:39 PM
DetroitVelvetSmooth DetroitVelvetSmooth is offline
Sarnak

DetroitVelvetSmooth's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duckwalk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just pointing out Furgeson citizens have every right to be mad not that I'm encouraging rioting.
Its ok man, we can agree.
__________________
I apologize for the prior sig gif. Here are some kittens.
  #10  
Old 11-25-2014, 01:07 PM
BulletCatcher BulletCatcher is offline
Orc

BulletCatcher's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 49
Default

Feel the burn Duckwalk. This is why you should not run your mouth about things you know nothing about. Aint that right Hateraid... you fucking wannabe. We could just try Officer Wilson because that's what the masses want... Anyone else want another George Zimmerman thing to occur?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.