OFFICIAL PROPOSAL from FE/TMO

[DrKvothe]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If fighting a losing battle for a few months is somehow the same thing as dominating for two years then yea I agree with you. Otherwise, I have no idea what you're talking about.

I left out an 'and TMO'.

[Hailto]

Originally Posted by Lazie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh wow.. You guys are actually lumping TMO and FE-IB together now as far as kills per month as if FE-IB benefited from all those TMO kills. What alternate reality is this ?

Reality of a 54 shaman main.

[Barkingturtle]

If we really want a revolution, everyone needs to stop logging in until staff can figure out how to implement repops.

Every solution we come up with is flawed because it's based on guilds and players instead of the one entity that doesn't scheme for every advantage -- mobs. You can't solve players, but you can solve mobs.

[Happyfeet]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Give up your droppable loot, who cares. However, when you go to give that ex guild of your some no-drops, you'll be seen as circumventing the raiding rules and have both of your guilds banned.

Welcome to the new raiding rules.

Who in the world is going to police that? Huge holes in your logic.

[Yinikren]

Originally Posted by Hailto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's a good thing your opinion means fuck all in the grand scheme of things isn't it Yinikren?

You're right, that's why my system has the biggest following of people who could make it work while we are here shitting up this proposal for being a sad idea.

Who the fuck are you again?

[DrKvothe]

Fast posting means lots of mistakes.

[Hailto]

Originally Posted by Yinikren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who the fuck are you again?

Please tell me about your e-status.

[-Catherin-]

Originally Posted by Pheer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is exactly the kind of cancerous attitude you've all been claiming you want to get rid of. This entire discussion has shifted from finding a system that everyone can live with to the casual guilds feeling like theyre in the midst of some kind of e-revolution where now THEYRE the ones who make the rules and to hell with the "oppressive hardcore guilds"

Way to really take it out of context. never once said I was against compromise. but i'll say it again im not going to jump at what I view to be a flawed one just because a raid suspension is looming. that doesn't fix anything. I pointed out the truths of the situation we are all in.

You sound upset about this. How about this: current proposal is not going to be accepted most likely. So how bout we work on something else that may work? I already said what I support. doesn't mean I couldn't be convinced to change my mind if you have a better idea.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Happyfeet [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Who in the world is going to police that? Huge holes in your logic.

Oh, I'm sorry, I thought we were making up shit that would most likely never happen.

[Splorf22]

Originally Posted by Pheer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is exactly the kind of cancerous attitude you've all been claiming you want to get rid of. This entire discussion has shifted from finding a system that everyone can live with to the casual guilds feeling like theyre in the midst of some kind of e-revolution where now THEYRE the ones who make the rules and to hell with the "oppressive hardcore guilds"

This is just not true. The TMO/FE proposal is borderline disingenous imo (you can't poopsock but we can camp out alts, AND DON'T GO NEAR VP YOU FUCKING CASUAL SCUM). I think those provisions soured a lot of people.