Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-08-2014, 05:51 PM
Snackies Snackies is offline
Fire Giant

Snackies's Avatar

Join Date: May 2012
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 560
Default

This one time I had a grudge but it turned out I was sitting on two Skittles
__________________
Good times, sorry you weren't there.
  #2  
Old 06-08-2014, 06:10 PM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Also, it has not worked because of the same reasons--we have no way to make such agreements binding and no way to impose penalty if such an agreement is broken. We need P99 notaries, for starters.
  #3  
Old 06-08-2014, 06:26 PM
Hitpoint Hitpoint is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 359
Default

A lot of what goes on these days in the raid scene is ridiculous though. One ridiculous thing pays back another. It's still better than it used to be, imo.
  #4  
Old 06-08-2014, 10:24 PM
Dragonsblood1987 Dragonsblood1987 is offline
Sarnak

Dragonsblood1987's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MURIKA
Posts: 201
Default

AG got suspended for sending 5 people to help another guild with a kill. If TMO doesn't eat one it's verified bush/ towers/ rmt bribes to a gm that rhymes with gherkin.
__________________
"Something something darkness something"-Nietzsche
  #5  
Old 06-08-2014, 10:26 PM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonsblood1987 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
AG got suspended for sending 5 people to help another guild with a kill. If TMO doesn't eat one it's verified bush/ towers/ rmt bribes to a gm that rhymes with gherkin.
Did AG make that decision as a guild or did those 5 players conspire together? The punishment should fit bearing this in mind. I don't think anyone really wanted AG suspended, that was on the GMs due to the very specific nature of the lockout rules.
  #6  
Old 06-08-2014, 10:35 PM
Dragonsblood1987 Dragonsblood1987 is offline
Sarnak

Dragonsblood1987's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MURIKA
Posts: 201
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HeallunRumblebelly [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Did AG make that decision as a guild or did those 5 players conspire together? The punishment should fit bearing this in mind. I don't think anyone really wanted AG suspended, that was on the GMs due to the very specific nature of the lockout rules.
So basically if TMO trains it's just the one guy at fault as though he's untagged, but if 5 people from guild 1 go to help guild 2 it's hands down definitely a ban worthy guild wide offense? TMO must know just how sirken likes that dick worked.
__________________
"Something something darkness something"-Nietzsche
  #7  
Old 06-08-2014, 10:38 PM
Lazie Lazie is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonsblood1987 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So basically if TMO trains it's just the one guy at fault as though he's untagged, but if 5 people from guild 1 go to help guild 2 it's hands down definitely a ban worthy guild wide offense? TMO must know just how sirken likes that dick worked.
No the difference is Class R vs Class C. Class R is restricted for a reason. It guarantees spawns that Class C guilds can't touch for other guilds on the server to have an opportunity to kill. Lockouts are in place on these mobs to make sure these spawns can't be monopolized by 1 or 2 guilds. While what AG did (Helping out Europa) isn't something bad in intent. It did break the lockout rule in place that you must follow to be eligible to kill Class R mobs.
  #8  
Old 06-09-2014, 04:59 PM
bigsykedaddy bigsykedaddy is offline
Sarnak

bigsykedaddy's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 365
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonsblood1987 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So basically if TMO trains it's just the one guy at fault as though he's untagged, but if 5 people from guild 1 go to help guild 2 it's hands down definitely a ban worthy guild wide offense? TMO must know just how sirken likes that dick worked.
You guys helped kill a raid target... there was no raid target in fear that day, and none in window either.
  #9  
Old 06-08-2014, 10:44 PM
doyoueventrainbro doyoueventrainbro is offline
Decaying Skeleton


Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonsblood1987 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
AG got suspended for sending 5 people to help another guild with a kill. If TMO doesn't eat one it's verified bush/ towers/ rmt bribes to a gm that rhymes with gherkin.
dayuum
  #10  
Old 06-09-2014, 06:34 AM
Strifer Strifer is offline
Sarnak

Strifer's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragonsblood1987 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
AG got suspended for sending 5 people to help another guild with a kill. If TMO doesn't eat one it's verified bush/ towers/ rmt bribes to a gm that rhymes with gherkin.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ITD1tqXDII
__________________
SAEANORN THE MACHO MAGE ON QUARM
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.