monk ratios, primary and offhand choices

[Troxx]

Ok. Go parse a flurry drake in NToV.

Be sure to upload the video to YouTube.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok. Go parse a flurry drake in NToV.

Be sure to upload the video to YouTube.

See? He can't name one target or timeframe. He is just afraid of being wrong.

Everybody knows you aren't going to solo a Flurry Drake. This is a non answer.

[Troxx]

I’ve taught a lot of medical students and young residents over the years. You occasionally find the broken one who is unable to think independently and become the self-motivated adult learner that is really required to work in the field.

-Most of the ones in medical school are likely to fail.

-Those few who manage to squeak through and pass medical school almost always wash out of residency and go off to work in some fail-boat doc in a box style urgent care never having finished the most substantial and important part of their medical training.

DSM: there is no argument you’re going to win here. I already know the answer. I also know you won’t listen to me. You’ve already shit on work I’ve done for you in the past. You were then (and I expect you probably still are) incapable of understanding the data you were given. Perhaps you’ll be more prone to a “eureka” moment if you gather the data yourself.

Put down the napkin and the calculator. Go forth and parse! Pick a zone, pick some targets. Gather data. Lots of it! Then go somewhere else fun and do it again. I promise over time it will all fall into place. It doesn’t have to be a chore.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Troxx continues to provide nothing to back up his claims. He writes paragraphs of off-topic nonsense to cover his lack of knowledge.

At the end of the day, he just keeps proving he has no idea how to properly parse mobs. He should be able to easily give us examples of mobs he's parsed in the past to come to his conclusions, and the timeframe.

Troxx doesn't give specifics because then he can't weasel his way out of being wrong. For someone supposdely so smart, he isn't hiding this obvious tactic very well. He is simply afraid to be wrong.

[Troxx]

/sigh

Are you really not smart enough to do this by yourself?

Originally Posted by Troxx

You need to find out what part of the game you want to investigate. Your parse target will be dictated by the answers you are seeking to find.

It seems that your primary goal is to know how well your dual wield setup works vs IFS on an appropriate level xp mob for your level 52 monk.

Pro-tips:

-find an ideal xp mob in a zone you would consider xping in.
-find a static mob that gives xp, preferably low traffic area where nobody else will touch the mob
-beat on it until either you or the mob are nearly dead.
-FD so you/it can regen
-stand up rinse and repeat until you have a lot more than 2-3 minutes worth of data while controlling for all other variables
-analyze that data

Now move to a different zone (preferably different expansions as you see the biggest variance in going from classic to kunark to velious more than, say, separate zones within Kunark).

Once you have done that you will have a really good idea of the reality for a level 52 monk. Be careful not to assume that “truth” for a level 52 monk is the same as a level 60 monk - it will NOT be the same (scaling dmg bonus, innate triple attack at 60, etc).

There you go. That was me channeling and wearing my overly-patient attending physician hat.

Further begging for parses, parse targets or general requests for holding your hand will simply get another “go fuck yourself” response.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Further begging for parses, parse targets or general requests for holding your hand will simply get another “go fuck yourself” response.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[DeathsSilkyMist]

No specific targets. No timeframe. He will just continue to claim all parses are insufficent to stroke his ego. I feel bad for his students. He probably just claims he is better than them and dodges their questions like he does here. How depressing.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Back to trolling. Troxx does this when he knows he's lost. I accept your consession. Let me know when you want to act like an adult and have a data driven conversation. Give us some examples of what you have parsed in the past and we can compare notes.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Give us some examples of what you have parsed in the past and we can compare notes.

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Further begging for parses, parse targets or general requests for holding your hand will simply get another “go fuck yourself” response.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[bcbrown]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have always enjoyed applying the scientific method to my addiction of choice (EQ). I genuinely find satisfaction in it - that’s why I parse things literally any time I’m on with a heads up display. I don’t often do the deep dive but it does give you a good general awareness.

Most common theme I see? People have no idea how much damage they actually do. Most people severely overestimate what they or some classes can do.

Same - I probably get more enjoyment from maths and data analysis than I do from video games, even. But I'm also a relative newb at EQ, having only played a total of about two years, never raiding yet, and mostly playing casters. Not much interesting to parse on a solo druid.

I'm sure that the Worn Shai`din Naginata at 37/45 +6str will clearly outclass the Spined Dragon Claws at 10/21 with offhand Green Jade Broadsword at 11/25 +8str, but absolutely no clue what the dps will be for each setup. It'll be fun to make some predictions before running the parses.

And thanks for sending me those parses, Troxx. They're really helpful for developing the methodology and coming up with the right hypotheses. I'll be able to get a parse for each side tonight to debug the methodology, but it'll probably take until this weekend to get enough data to share publicly.