Seal Team removes ourselves from all player agreements

[xmaerx]

Originally Posted by Bach [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They clearly broken the play Nice policies.

Agreeing to stuff then breaking agreement because you suck at competing fairly is a dick move.

Fact. Intentionally misleading/defraud other players is against the rules. Bailing on an agreement without proper notice, per Galach's post, qualifies as defrauding other players.

But yes, if FTE racing is an endorsed type of competition, then encouraging those FTE races is the only solution here. That means shorter windows at a minimum, maybe even a no-engage period to kill the necessity for login speed, as well as server messages or warnings when they pop / are due soon.

Zerg guilds will always win because more people = faster deployment of necessary numbers, which is often not very many. The rate at which you can quickly DEPLOY a small number of people is hugely higher as you add people to your guild. Easing the burden of fielding elite poopsocking swarms of neckbeards is the only realistic solution.

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by Local [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The UN itself is a player agreement.

One which was completely nullified the first time the staff got DMed about rotational content.

Originally Posted by Bach [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They clearly broken the play Nice policies.

Agreeing to stuff then breaking agreement because you suck at competing fairly is a dick move.

Damn! We just agreed.

[Local]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

One which was completely nullified the first time the staff got DMed about rotational content.

The staff may not share your opinion there. In any case, I think it's time I leave you be to live in your alternate reality. We hope you'll join us in the shared, objective one the rest of us are enjoying.

Until then.

[Seducio]

Local, it appears Seal Team has already faced a CSR punishment for breaking the rules.

What more did you want?



For the harmony of the server it would make sense for UN guilds to not get too cozy with current arrangements once Seal Team is unbanned.

[Local]

Originally Posted by Seducio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Local, it appears Seal Team has already faced a CSR punishment for breaking the rules.

What more did you want?



For the harmony of the server it would make sense for UN guilds to not get too cozy with current arrangements once Seal Team is unbanned.

I didn't want anything. It was stated that Seal Team didn't break any rules. I disagreed because they did.

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by Local [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I didn't want anything. It was stated that Seal Team didn't break any rules. I disagreed because they did.

So nullifying the UN by asking for rotated content long before this isn't breaking an agreement to you. How selective.

They didn't break any rule as you had nullified all agreements long before, yet you still disagree anyways lol.

[Lostfaction]

Where are Hillary's emails about rotational content?

[Seducio]

Who cares?

Seal Team and DMO both got smacked for different reasons and they got smacked hard.

Whoever plays on that team that continues on Green will eventually be able to raid again as long as they follow PNP.

PNP is the law of the land. Always has been.

Until and unless CSR actually codifies UN it is temporary.

[Jack N]

I would like... a pizza.

This is binding.

[Local]

Originally Posted by Jack N [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I would like... a pizza.

This is binding.

I would support this as a server rule.