"We've weighed our options and...all we really lose is one Warrior" -Riot 2020

[voydent]

Originally Posted by Hotel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

above image is the petition status as of 9/22, but nice narrative you got going on there

thanks for the SS of the current petition status. hope people can see what i see:


- Look at the Who column

- now ask yourself, why is "F" in almost every single line as the accused party (right side of the 'versus')

- the reason that people want to believe is because Riot is a 'lawyerquest' guild, they can only win by petitioning etc. but this statement is only true if most of the petitions results are "no violation". as of today, out of 6 petitions against F, only 2 were 'no violation' while 4 were either suspended (guilty), or dropped (conceded). so the petitions raised were indeed justifiable as F was indeed guilty the majority (4 out of 6) of the times

- this may get worse when you consider the current pending petitions. Kittens v F for LTK was particularly nasty as F trained and wiped Kittens at LTK, left without helping them do CR to kill Yelinak, and went to POG to kill Tunare which was only possible because Riot left POG to help Kittens do CR. F offered to concede future LTKs (which would have been a relatively small concession to make given what they accomplished that day). Kittens justifiably said no and wanted tougher penalty

- F continues to push the limits and tries to get away with things. if they commit a foul but no one has fraps, they WILL get away with it. (the first question their leaders will ask is "do you have fraps?")

- in the meantime, the number of outstanding petitions keep piling up. part 2 of the strategy is to eventually make the GMs lose their patience and suspend-bomb all the big 3 guilds, which net net would be beneficial for F

- overtime, this strategy does pay off because F gets to keep the raid loots from those mobs that were petitioned. Loot 1 concede 2 is a viable strategy because they will occassionally get Loot 1 and get a pass (because no fraps or GMs get tired of all the bs)

- Solution? (1) harsher (much harsher) punishments for repeated offenders, (2) raid loot deletion

[Akg49]

Grats on that sick Tunare kill AG/F, actually very good job there.

[Dogma]

Neat. Show the killcount for this cycle next.

Freedom kills Riot more often than Freedom and AG kill a dragon.

[Akg49]

KT
Dain
Yelinak
Statue/AoW
Dagarn
Cekenar
Sevelak
Zlexak
Eashen
Lady M
Lady N
LTK w/ friends
Gozzrem
Ikatiar
Silverwing
Xygoz
Druushk
Hoshkar
Fear Golems
Draco
CT
Vyemm w/ friends (Grats Kittens Vyemm dagger)
Vulak
+Zlandicar
+Klandicar

AGF did get a sweet train 10 times, get a free Doze prize though.
(Their Tunare was legit, I will say that)

[Dogma]

Wuoshi not even on that list. Seems short. Seeing a lot of Kills that I'm not getting DKP for still. (lol my RA sucks these last few weeks)

[Hotel]

free mobs best mobs

[Dogma]

Originally Posted by Hotel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

free mobs best mobs

Not seeing a list. You had a good excel of petitions against Freedom. Where's excel of mobs?

Or should I wait for next newsletter?

[Naonak]

Win 1, concede 2 needs to change to include loot deletion or go to concede 4.

But still, winning and then having to concede with keeping loot is far better than never winning by following the play nice policy.

Guess we need GM's to make decisions, not friends.

[kjs86z]

go outside

[strongNpretty]

Originally Posted by kjs86z [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

go outside