![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
So basically Giegue's post sums it up: Aiaus' IP exemption should be gone. Additional punishments, while warranted by global rules (this is VP after-all), are discretionary. The good news is, FE shouldn't have to put up with Aiaus doing this again, on to the next IP-exempt cleric that attempts this!
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
O, and put in your IP exemption tonight, because its "questionably legal" at this point. So you're in the clear until you get caught doing it.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
who cares about fancy coding , or more rules to prevent someone from committing an infraction
until p99 enforces its existing rule set with the punishments already laid out all that coding is a waste of time. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
|||
|
They probably would have banned on red if banning 1 person didnt eliminate 1/3 the population.
__________________
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
__________________________________
Carsomyr - 55 Pally - Retired Thalon - 49 Rogue - Temporarily Benched Contagious - Necro - 30's and climbing Lights - 55 Wiz - Occasional Murderer | |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Months of "plz come to VP FE".
Now we come to VP even with half of our guild still unkeyed and now you cheat because you get your ass kicked from a little FE force? I know that i repeat myself, but all i can say is: pussys Every single day i would be ashamed to wear a TMO over my head. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Exploiting pathing (so as to not get hit): suspension
Exploiting IP exemption to dual box: ban/suspension. Exploiting IP exemption for instant aggro drop (thus doing both of above): no suspension? Some people here need to review their scale of values.
__________________
Retired
Daimadoshi, Arch Magician <Divinity> Kurth, Warlock <Divinity> Kaska, Phantasmist <Divinity> Fuam, Druid 57 <Divinity> Willo, Cleric 54 <Divinity> | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|