Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cyxthryth is almost as persistent at trying to get DSM to respond to him as DSM is about how good shamans are at everything

I still find it funny DSM literally will not talk to him. He’ll respond to my gifs and flat out insults from others … but will not say a word directly to him.

It’s a mystery

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Crede]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I still find it funny DSM literally will not talk to him. He’ll respond to my gifs and flat out insults from others … but will not say a word directly to him.

It’s a mystery

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Same, it's hilariously obvious how DSM is afraid to engage him in any direct discussion. He actually resorted to trolling him in their brief exchange in this thread with Essence Lens stuff. Here's some history:

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nah, that's going to be Troxx and friends complaining because they don't have good data, and can't accept the truth or basic math.

The thread should have been over here: https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=638 , but the truth has thrown them into a rage they can't get out of, and must try and hide the truth with silly troll posts.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"Silly troll posts" huh? I see where this is going. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You called me "silly" when you were backed into a corner by my replies to you on the below thread too, and you stopped replying (like a little bitch): https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37.
Your concession in silence was accepted. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I see you haven't quite given up on this current thread just yet though. *chuckle* Take as much time as you need. You will certainly move on to hyper-focus on another thread/topic in which you'll continue to demonstrate your seemingly-apparent autism to all neurotypicals who encounter your posts.
I can only speak for myself, but your inevitable concession in silence for this thread is accepted in advance. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wow. Sorry you are so mad lol. You can choose to believe that is what happened in the thread you linked[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Sorry you don't got Warder loot, silly.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your multiple apologies are accepted alongside your silent concessions, both prior and pending. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Still mad. Still bad. Still sad. No Warder loot either. Essence Lens is great though, and better than most Warder loot. So you will be fine.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You do not know who I am, neither in-game nor IRL, you do not know what loot I have and you do not know how I feel. You may choose to type whatever you wish, it does not change those facts. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you don't care, then why bother posting false nonsense?

Clearly you are still mad from that other thread (which is 4 months old at this point), which is why you are bringing it up lol.

Seriously it is ok. Essence Lens is better than most of the Warder loot you would have gotten. Only the most dedicated of raiders are getting SoM or Fungi Robe, and that is honestly only a few people. None of the other loot really matters. You could argue gnome mask if you are a fashion fanatic, but that is besides the point.

EDIT: I am not going to be responding to any more posts about this silly nonsense involving the other thread with you cyxthryth. Either you are attempting to troll (poorly), or you have some weird grudge and felt the need to bring up a 4 month old thread that isn't even related to this one. Not a good look either way. Please stick to RnF if you want to make a thread about it[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's really brilliant how he has managed to defeat DSM in all occasions resulting in him having to troll/ignore cyx.

[Troxx]

Wait … is there a whole ‘mother thread out there I am missing out on Crede?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Crede [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Same, it's hilariously obvious how DSM is afraid to engage him in any direct discussion. He actually resorted to trolling him in their brief exchange in this thread with Essence Lens stuff. Here's some history:

It's really brilliant how he has managed to defeat DSM in almost all occasions resulting in him having to troll/ignore cyx.

It amazes me that you have to resort to posting what I said out of context, because you have no valid argument in this thread. Anybody who actually looks at what I was responding to will see I was defending myself from nonsense posting.

This is the worst attempt yet.

Do people not know you can look back at the post history?

[Crede]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wait … is there a whole ‘mother thread out there I am missing out on Crede?

There have been many threads which DSM has blew up in your absence.

The one cyx mentioned above, DSM tried to use facts to state that people didn't have the right to be mad about the sleeper getting awakened, in which he was eventually silenced again by cyx.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Crede [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There have been many threads which DSM has blew up in your absence.

The one cyx mentioned above, DSM tried to use facts to state that people didn't have the right to be mad about the sleeper getting awakened, in which he was eventually silenced again by cyx.

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...401629&page=37

Defendng yourself from trolling is not blowng up, and you can read what they said first. I never started it. This is just sad. You are just posting me defending myself from trolling lol. Great job at showing nothing.

[tadkins]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Both types of players are equally welcome on P99, so you can't really help one without hurting the other. If you keep the math fuzzy to enhance your play experience, then the math inclined suffer, and vice versa.

I certainly don't feel welcome on P99 as a wizard.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by tadkins [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I certainly don't feel welcome on P99 as a wizard.

I am sorry to hear that. The data for the game has been out for years at this point, so unless P99 purposely changes the server to be more custom, people will already know which classes are underpowered. I don't think tumhe genie can be put back in the bottle.

[Crede]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It amazes me that you have to resort to posting what I said out of context, because you have no valid argument in this thread. Anybody who actually looks at what I was responding to will see I was defending myself from nonsense posting.

This is the worst attempt yet.

Do people not know you can look back at the post history?

My argument is perfectly valid, and has been backed by the majority of this thread.

It is really quite sad that you had to resort to posting data irrelevant to this discussion(1-2 shaman fights) and had to goalpost shift(5 classes) in an attempt to defend your flawed argument.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Crede [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My argument is perfectly valid, and has been backed by the majority of this thread.

It is really quite sad that you had to resort to posting data irrelevant to this discussion(1-2 shaman fights) and had to goalpost shift(5 classes) in an attempt to defend your flawed argument.

The only sad thing here is you are posting things out of context, which can easily be disproven. Its desparate.

You are really afraid of basic math and data, I don't know why.