Resist Feedback post 11/6/2011

[minakto]

basicaly 150pr = 50% resist. Most classes are going to have a hard time breaking 100pr

[Pudge]

but Null.. does your double check method happen over a long period of time? so as to account for the RNG being streaky?

just curious

[Null]

Originally Posted by Pudge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

but Null.. does your double check method happen over a long period of time? so as to account for the RNG being streaky?

just curious

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[lethdar]

Originally Posted by Pudge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

but Null.. does your double check method happen over a long period of time? so as to account for the RNG being streaky?

just curious

wat

[Fang]

Originally Posted by Darwoth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ebolt is going to be made unresistable like some magic dots it needs to be modified to come off in a single cure as magic dots do with a single dispel

if you are going to make ebolt come off with one cure, then you also need to:

make dispel remove a random magic based effect
or
make dispel remove detrimental effects before beneficial
or
keep stupid ideas to yourself

[Pudge]

i was serious lol. i thought nukes landing depended on the RNG (as well as resists). and i know the RNG is streaky. so if 1000 casts were simulated in the same second, then there wouldn't be a wide disparity in the RNG numbers it checked against. yielding results that weren't truly representative

[Null]

Originally Posted by Pudge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

i was serious lol. i thought nukes landing depended on the RNG (as well as resists). and i know the RNG is streaky. so if 1000 casts were simulated in the same second, then there wouldn't be a wide disparity in the RNG numbers it checked against. yielding results that weren't truly representative

The values I listed are the numbers that your RNG 'rolls' against, which stay the same across resistances.

[Pudge]

ahhh i got it now. thanks.

i thought your "double checking" was you actually running a simulation of casting 1000 times or whatever, and reporting the resist rates in percentages. (like actually casting a spell and parsing out the results, but faster). - but now i understand what you meant

[Crazerous]

ebolt landing 50% of the time w/ 150+ PR is ridiculous

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by Crazerous [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ebolt landing 50% of the time w/ 150+ PR is ridiculous

And I heard lifetaps are being resisted... probably just trolling. But the poison thing, yeah.