Bin Laden's dead - Page 30

Turtles · #**291** 05-06-2011, 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

^ long-winded, emotional post from a fat guy.

Dude, you're not getting what you want. I'm not going to stop posting, and you're really not getting under my skin. Call me a gay, short virgin while you're at it if you like. They're all equally wrong and equally unlikely to piss me off. The only result is you shitting up the thread, which I suppose is partially your intent. Oh well. That's your prerogative. You know more about it than I do. It's your life.

purist · #**292** 05-06-2011, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turtles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dude, you're not getting what you want. I'm not going to stop posting, and you're really not getting under my skin. Call me a gay, short virgin while you're at it if you like. They're all equally wrong and equally unlikely to piss me off. The only result is you shitting up the thread, which I suppose is partially your intent. Oh well. That's your prerogative. You know more about it than I do. It's your life.

you sound extremely fat

baalzy · #**293** 05-06-2011, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turtles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dude, you're not getting what you want. I'm not going to stop posting, and you're really not getting under my skin. Call me a gay, short virgin while you're at it if you like. They're all equally wrong and equally unlikely to piss me off. The only result is you shitting up the thread, which I suppose is partially your intent. Oh well. That's your prerogative. You know more about it than I do. It's your life.

I'm pretty sure it didn't take 30 pages to shit up this thread.

Fairly certain it happened within the first 10 posts.

Turtles · #**294** 05-06-2011, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baalzy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm pretty sure it didn't take 30 pages to shit up this thread.

Fairly certain it happened within the first 10 posts.

Pretty true.

Slathar · #**295** 05-06-2011, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turtles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dude, you're not getting what you want. I'm not going to stop posting, and you're really not getting under my skin. Call me a gay, short virgin while you're at it if you like. They're all equally wrong and equally unlikely to piss me off. The only result is you shitting up the thread, which I suppose is partially your intent. Oh well. That's your prerogative. You know more about it than I do. It's your life.

what is diabetes like? are you blind yet, fatty mcfatterson?

Aprio · #**296** 05-06-2011, 06:59 PM

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Crover_CT99 · #**297** 05-06-2011, 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turtles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wayyyy more likely than Scenario B, but I'd still put it significantly behind Scenario A. I just don't think this kind of attack could have been pre-confirmed to the extent that you'd intentionally let it happen. I doubt even Al Qaeda knew it would work before it actually did, let alone the US. You have to consider the thousands and thousands of national security threats that the US deals with on a daily basis. Before 9/11, if one of the 100 potential threats that crossed your desk was "Islamic terrorists planning to hijack planes, use them as weapons", would you consider that a highly credible threat? It probably went in the same pile as "PETA plans to dam Niagara Falls with stolen school buses."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_P._O%27Neill

Interesting guy to read up on. Long story short: he was an FBI agent who had been known for his intuition and was sidelined for internal politics. He was hired as the head of security at the WTC soon before 9/11 and died in the attacks. There is a Frontline documentary about him if I remember correctly.

To the point of the original poster, it is likely intelligence about the attack was indeed out there prior to the attack. These kind of loose ends are what fuels alternative theories (I think the blanket conspiracy theory label is disingenuous).

Harrison · #**298** 05-07-2011, 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Turtles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dude, you're not getting what you want. I'm not going to stop posting, and you're really not getting under my skin. Call me a gay, short virgin while you're at it if you like. They're all equally wrong and equally unlikely to piss me off. The only result is you shitting up the thread, which I suppose is partially your intent. Oh well. That's your prerogative. You know more about it than I do. It's your life.

That's pretty much how Purist rolls. He'll rage out and call you fat, short, virgin, and anything he can like a child, while claiming it's you who is raging.

The kid is pretty predictable.

Slathar · #**299** 05-07-2011, 03:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's pretty much how Purist rolls. He'll rage out and call you fat, short, virgin, and anything he can like a child, while claiming it's you who is raging.

The kid is pretty predictable.

does that include lying to the internet about being a combat medic while your friends run a train on your girlfriend?

purist · #**300** 05-07-2011, 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's pretty much how Purist rolls. He'll rage out and call you fat, short, virgin, and anything he can like a child, while claiming it's you who is raging.

The kid is pretty predictable.

predictable? yea, the slightest potshot and I can predict your emotional, butthurt response

p.s. you're fat