How Blood Guard does Lodi

[orangemang]

Originally Posted by Dreenk317 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As i said, way back on like page 4, I think sirken came to a very fair ruling, neither side got anything, then AG came here because they felt that wasnt fair. And you clearly dont know many people from BG, lots of very stand up players there, mana included, just like in AG, but every tree has some bad apples.

The GM ruling was fair and I'm the one that petitioned. He responded instantly and the mob was despawned when almost dead. There was no instant petition. The AG duo didn't catch a ban simply because there wasn't evidence the enchanter didn't charm it off us with malicious intent. By OPs own words, she's a noob. However he should have know exactly what was up the moment she told him we were at Grizz's spawn because god know his quest item is garbage.

[Heebs13]

Originally Posted by orangemang [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The GM ruling was fair and I'm the one that petitioned. He responded instantly and the mob was despawned when almost dead. There was no instant petition. The AG duo didn't catch a ban simply because there wasn't evidence the enchanter didn't charm it off us with malicious intent. By OPs own words, she's a noob. However he should have know exactly what was up the moment she told him we were at Grizz's spawn because god know his quest item is garbage.

Since the only thing you lost was Grizlin Bloodfang while the other players lost Lodi, I imagine from your point of view it would seem a rather fair ruling, wouldn't it?

[orangemang]

Originally Posted by Heebs13 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Since the only thing you lost was Grizlin Bloodfang while the other players lost Lodi, I imagine from your point of view it would seem a rather fair ruling, wouldn't it?

Not my fault they didn't drop Griz... We lost a chance at Lodi. It ain't over till it's a corpse bruh.

[richf275]

Originally Posted by Dreenk317 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And you clearly dont know many people from BG, lots of very stand up players there, mana included,

You're not a "stand up player" if your intent is to screw over other people for your own gain.

[Dreenk317]

Originally Posted by richf275 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're not a "stand up player" if your intent is to screw over other people for your own gain.

so your also on the "every member of a guild that has someone that did something i dont like must be an evil baby puncher" boat eh?

[richf275]

Originally Posted by Dreenk317 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

so your also on the "every member of a guild that has someone that did something i dont like must be an evil baby puncher" boat eh?

I mean the leaders and several members of the guild have all commented on this thread and defended BG. Like screwing over the guys who were camping the mob is some sort of elite guild strategy.

[Loke]

Originally Posted by Dreenk317 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

so your also on the "every member of a guild that has someone that did something i dont like must be an evil baby puncher" boat eh?

Sorry, some of us think judging people by the company they keep is a vital tool in drawing conclusions about others when working with limited information. If you hang out with a bunch of meth heads IRL, I'm probably going to have a different opinion than if you volunteer for the big brother/big sister program. If you knowingly associate with scum bags, you might be a scum bag. Case in point, I left DA leadership back in the day because I disagreed with the tactics the leader and other officers wanted to employ. I didn't want to do something I thought was scummy, so I denounced it, and when they disagreed with me I left. That is what people with ethics and conviction do.

[Manasana2]

Delusional of what. I looked at all the data from my members and the GMs responses... BG did not break any rules and the GM even said it... yet AG confirmed broke rules and the Gm despawned it. its a stupid lodi and a joke of a RNF thread there is no High and mighty. you bold BOTH parties like BG had lodi or something... we simply using tactics and strategy to decrease the AG duos success rate. again its not the first person/persons to get FTE its the first to kill it. Do you think AG would have started this thread on any other guild I think not..

[Heebs13]

Originally Posted by Manasana2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Delusional of what. I looked at all the data from my members and the GMs responses... BG did not break any rules and the GM even said it... yet AG confirmed broke rules and the Gm despawned it. its a stupid lodi and a joke of a RNF thread there is no High and mighty. you bold BOTH parties like BG had lodi or something... we simply using tactics and strategy to decrease the AG duos success rate. again its not the first person/persons to get FTE its the first to kill it. Do you think AG would have started this thread on any other guild I think not..

The fact that you think this is something to be proud of speaks volumes.

[Sadiki]

Originally Posted by Manasana2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

we simply using tactics and strategy to decrease the AG duos success rate

lol

summoning a GM is tactics and strategy

Welcome to RnF Mana, don't ever leave