Proposition For Raid Rules - Input Requested

[radditsu]

Of course it would still behoove upper guilds to kill trak... but late in month spawns could be opened up. Of it is agreed to not poopsock/camp out in traks office as part of a gentlemenly agreement. They have just as much chance as anybody else. If they can mobilize.

I am trying to strike a balance between the hardcore. And people with kids...


I am not worrying about velious yet..but it could def be expanded.

If they want to split guilds they need to rely on THEIR OWN people. Shenanigans should be taken up with guild council and/or server staff.

[radditsu]

Tmo will have to race against tmo2 and tmo3 and tmo4 on their own merits.

I am sure some tmo hate the others and only bind together for pixels anyway.

[HeallunRumblebelly]

Originally Posted by radditsu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Tmo will have to race against tmo2 and tmo3 and tmo4 on their own merits.

...Why? They'd be working together.

[quido]

I'm not hearing much support for tokens or whatever they're called from people in TMO/FE/IB.

[Yinikren]

Like I said before, split guilds could easily be solved by requiring them to be active for a predetermined amount of time before they are allowed to raid regularly. And GMs should still be able to watch for splitting nonsense.

I think the idea should be to come up with a system that works and can be adapted to velious, rather than us being back in this same position 6 months or a year from now. Points costs and easily be voted on and adjusted and the system wouldn't need change, other than implementing it and getting everyone on board.

[radditsu]

Originally Posted by Yinikren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

They aren't punished for doing VP- they are paying to do those mobs instead of epic mobs or trak. They shouldn't get both.

Explain. They did put a ton of effort in the key quests and the poopsocking for a tooth and the training. This system still rewards effort.

I am not married to the 220 out of 580 either. The concept is the point.

[Troubled]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not hearing much support for tokens or whatever they're called from people in TMO/FE/IB.

Propose a better plan. Alarti's was ok, but he made sure to leave Trak/VS/CT a shitshow.

[radditsu]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not hearing much support for tokens or whatever they're called from people in TMO/FE/IB.

I could give a shit! Mine is an intellectual pursuit.

[HeallunRumblebelly]

Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not hearing much support for tokens or whatever they're called from people in TMO/FE/IB.

If it's a majority consensus, tmo/fe/ib's input on the raid scene is much smaller than the teeming masses who haven't gotten a kill in a long time, if ever. The conflicting interests will make for interesting proposals. The fact of the matter is, unless GMs say that TMO and IBFE cannot engage a target, they will kill that target, so any ruleset will have to have some way for those guilds to be able to engage a target hours after without interference.

I think it's important to remember that those who want to raid on this server without having to dedicate their lives to it are far greater in number than those who are currently raiding. Casuals killing even classic EQ I guess [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Tegellan]

Epics for everyone!