Trak Watch - 2012

[Tarathiel]

valid point, though i doubt anyone who is still raiding will care. most likely they will continue the same cycle of douchebaggery because that is whats encouraged. until the raid guilds have some sort of motivation to get along things will never change. as it stands they can hate each other all they want and keep shitting up the raid scene because they know some GM will come through and fix everything.

[Autotune]

I would be 15manning shit until FTE shouts were put in.

[Metallikus]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I would be 15manning shit until FTE shouts were put in.

Since the current raid rule is clearly written as there is no 15 man rue, you would be wasting your time.

[Harazzer]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I would be 15manning shit until FTE shouts were put in.

But instead you are just a stupid forum troll, so no one gives a fuck!

[uygi]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also, if staff wanted to, they could solve this problem easily.

Any guild that has someone on the aggro list of a raid mob without having FTE has their guild Raid suspended for a month and each character suspended for 3 months.

Now see how many people want to risk sitting on fucking raid spawn points.

+1 for Russian Roullette, but tone down the consequences to 1 week guild, 2 week player. Then people can roll the dice if they're willing to face the consequences. 50/50 shot that you get suspended or your opponent does? Whatever guild sits out wins reduced competition for a week, would help thin things out to have a guild or two out sometimes [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Tanthallas]

every raid mob killed after the first one at some arbitrary point (like 1st of the month and reset at 15th) must be killed with a maximum of 20% less people than some set standard.

60people --- 47people --- 38 people --- 30 people --- ...

Just seems like it would be interesting, and would force guilds that claim to be the best quality and not merely quantity to work with very minimal numbers toward the end of the periods based on the number of kills they have got.

[Hasbinlulz]

Originally Posted by Tanthallas [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

every raid mob killed after the first one at some arbitrary point (like 1st of the month and reset at 15th) must be killed with a maximum of 20% less people than some set standard.

60people --- 47people --- 38 people --- 30 people --- ...

Just seems like it would be interesting, and would force guilds that claim to be the best quality and not merely quantity to work with very minimal numbers toward the end of the periods based on the number of kills they have got.

That is actually a very cool idea. Not classic at all, but it would seriously cut the cream from the crop.

I envision having a 2 hour tick.. starts with 15 people, then to 20, then to 25, etc., every 2 hours a mob is up. Every guild that wants to should be able to engage at least once within 2 hours........

[Hasbinlulz]

I don't know if what I'm saying is the same as what you're saying.. But my post outlines an anti zerg method. Say if you had more then 15 people within X distance, the mob would banish.. Would require a non-interference agreement etc., of course, but that is very very interesting.

[arsenalpow]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYQdm...ature=youtu.be

[Hasbinlulz]

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYQdm...ature=youtu.be

This is cool.