Vote for obama

[Pico]

have u guys ever read atlas shrugged? might wanna check it out itll rly open ur eyes

pon raul 2012

[Rain1]

In the midst of the back and forth between the two pundits, O’Donnell brought up a quote Coulter gave to The Guardian in 2003 in which she said that women were one group she believed should have their right to vote taken away. When pressed by O’Donnell, Coulter stood by her comments, arguing that every election since 1950, aside from the 1964 Barry Goldwater election, would have been won by Republicans had it not been for the woman vote. Using her typical logic, Coulter said this presents enough reason to disenfranchise women.
/end thread

[Hollywood]

Originally Posted by Rain1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Obama wins, to quote "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned." Romney just chose Ryan, so this election will prove if women are truly dumb and subjugated or not. If you believe in equal pay for a woman (which I do) doing the same exact fucking job you are doing, you would vote Obama. (not that I agree on him being president, i think Mark Warner of Va, the epitome of "CENTER," should have been appointed the job years ago: He declined). If you would like a return to the "good ol' days" of women in the kitchen/household/pregnant you would vote Romney. If you disagree with my statement, why have Republican dominated legislatures voted down/removed "equal pay" laws? Just curious as to what the defense is for women getting paid less than men. I just don't get it.
-Rainmon

Originally Posted by Rain1 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In the midst of the back and forth between the two pundits, O’Donnell brought up a quote Coulter gave to The Guardian in 2003 in which she said that women were one group she believed should have their right to vote taken away. When pressed by O’Donnell, Coulter stood by her comments, arguing that every election since 1950, aside from the 1964 Barry Goldwater election, would have been won by Republicans had it not been for the woman vote. Using her typical logic, Coulter said this presents enough reason to disenfranchise women.
/end thread

Bitter unnecessarily much?

Look women get allll the benefits these days simply for being women. Maternity leave? Let's not even go there..

And Coulter is right. THe majority of women don't even vote, and the ones that do are - to put it mildly - flaming femi nazis still hell bent on molding the world to their selfish needy image, or simply run of the mill idiotic women ; which we have a lot of these days.

'Feminism' ruined everything. It's been fifty years of immoral and corrupt women abusing men for being immoral and corrupt. The irony is shocking and the results are worse.
Where are all those women that were going to 'heal the world,' because we gave them more 'freedoms'.

They never existed. It was all a ploy to give special privileges to self righteous twats who thought the world owed them more because they couldn't get on normally with society like everyone else. They couldn't cope, so everyone had to adjust to them.


Anyways, you people missed your chance by not voting more Constitutionalists in like Ron Paul. At least he gives a shit about the way things are meant to be - and unlike you paranoid delusional feminists, he's not talking about dish washing women whom should never leave the kitchen.

P.S. some women like staying at home....deal with it.

[Psionide]

women want equal rights until it's time to get off a sinking ship or go to the frontlines of war.....

[Heavydrop]

ABO

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wusgcG4rfo

[stonez138]

I wonder if Hollywood realises just how ignorant he sounds? Please name me "alll the benefits" women get these days for being women? As far as a lack of paternity leave in this country, it has nothing to do with femenists and everything to do with our lawmakers being completely beholden to business interests and not the peoples interests. That's why the VAST MAJORITY of the free world does have paternity leave. (and under 40 hour work week paid vacation and /gasp the right to quality health care)

Do you also believe that an aspirin for betwen her knees is the only birthcontrol a woman's insurance should have to pay for?

These are the real gems though....

It was all a ploy to give special privileges to self righteous twats who thought the world owed them more because they couldn't get on normally with society like everyone else.

I know! All those lesbians that don't want to raise a man's kids should have just been happy being teachers or nurses wtf do they think they have the right to other jobs for. And a man should still be able to slap his woman if she gets lippy!

It's been fifty years of immoral and corrupt women abusing men for being immoral and corrupt.

You are so right! We men have been SO savagely oppressed by women since 1962! Especially white men! FIGHT THE POWER!

Orruar, I don't think your post just doesn't hold water. According to your logic, any good capitalist would only hire the handicap, since they get tax breaks and/or subsidies for hiring these people wouldn't that be the cheapest possible labor pool? I'm sure a "good" capitalist also factors in things such as, I don't know, work experience or education.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by stonez138 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Orruar, I don't think your post just doesn't hold water. According to your logic, any good capitalist would only hire the handicap, since they get tax breaks and/or subsidies for hiring these people wouldn't that be the cheapest possible labor pool? I'm sure a "good" capitalist also factors in things such as, I don't know, work experience or education.

You do realize that we're discussing equal pay for equal work, right? The second half of that (equal work) directly states that the two candidates have the same productive capacity (work experience/education). And are you very familiar with the costs associated with hiring a disabled worker vs a non disabled worker? Do you employ both types of people are know all of the costs and benefits of both? I didn't think so. There are subsidies, yes, but there are also large costs to employing those with disabilities. They typically cost much more in lost time at work and on insurance. I don't have direct experience with employing them, but I can tell you that if we don't see a lot of employers making tons of money by employing them, then the subsidies are not overcoming the costs.

Do you refute the statement that if an equally qualified man and woman are applying for the same job at the same wage rate, and there is an additional cost of possible litigation due to EP4EW for hiring the woman, the business owner is just as likely to hire the woman as the man? Such a statement would imply that if you went to the gas station and had the option of paying $3/gal or $4/gal for the exact same gasoline, you'd pick the $4 just as often as the $3.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by stonez138 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you also believe that an aspirin for betwen her knees is the only birthcontrol a woman's insurance should have to pay for?

Why should the government dictate what things health insurance covers at all? That would be like dictating that all tshirts must be colored purple or all steaks must be cooked to medium rare and served with asparagus.

Free up the market (you mean we don't have a free market in health care already?!) and allow people to choose those plans that suit their needs. I'd love it if I could buy a plan that only covers drastic illnesses like cancer or broken back, and pay my way on the minor things like checkups. But I cannot purchase such a plan because it does not meet government regulations to qualify it as tax deductible.

[stonez138]

The ultimate irony though is Hollywood calling someone out for being bitter when his entire post is seething with resentment.

[tops419]

Vote for Obama
Most people will NEVER see 250K in a year, so don't worry about your taxes going up
Healthcare is impossibly expensive for normal folks.

Those voting for romney/republicans are delusional