Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 06-27-2012, 01:55 AM
knix knix is offline
Sarnak

knix's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harazzer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Pretty sure nietzche knows exactly what happened from BDA's point of view because he was probably still in the guild when this took place. Welcome TMO's newest member NIETZCHE!
Isnt this guy Blink who is suppose to be banned from the forums?
  #22  
Old 06-27-2012, 02:26 AM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,480
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Remember when IB stole a draco from us, then killed CT. However, Rogean was in the zone and he gave us CT loot by accident. He then took CT loot from us and gave us Draco's loot but didn't give IB CT loot.

Haha, those were good times.
That's my boy
  #23  
Old 06-27-2012, 07:16 AM
Maze513 Maze513 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Nasty Natti, Ohio
Posts: 267
Default

If they made a ruling that ONLY people who actively play on P99 could post on the forums....just makes you wonder
  #24  
Old 06-27-2012, 08:23 AM
Harrison Harrison is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,320
Default

Like if they made a rule that if you cheat you get permanently banned? Oh, wait, there is a rule like that.

It's just not enforced, ever.(Just beg to be unbanned in a couple months, npnp, integrity and legitimacy gone.)

2boxing and RMT are the only things that get you a permanent ban, even though the rules clearly state that exploiting and hacking are also grounds for a permanent ban.

I offered to run around with Fraps running(or streaming for GM/guides to watch live) on a permanently invisible, muted, level 1, guide character to help with adding some legitimacy to this server, but they don't want it for whatever reason.

They'd rather catch HUNDREDS of players hacking, and let them go...catch entire guilds exploiting raid encounters on both servers, and let them go.
  #25  
Old 06-27-2012, 09:31 AM
Harazzer Harazzer is offline
Aviak

Harazzer's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 83
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by knix [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Isnt this guy Blink who is suppose to be banned from the forums?
Oh the other hypocrite chimes in, how adorable. No this is Sominus, i didnt do anything as unforgivable as drawing nudity (lol) I just find it amusing how you and nietzche shit on bda in every thread after being members for 350 days of the last calendar year.
  #26  
Old 06-27-2012, 10:00 AM
Arteker Arteker is offline
Fire Giant

Arteker's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harazzer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Oh the other hypocrite chimes in, how adorable. No this is Sominus, i didnt do anything as unforgivable as drawing nudity (lol) I just find it amusing how you and nietzche shit on bda in every thread after being members for 350 days of the last calendar year.
something bad happens when old core members leave a guild where they stayed for so long long time.
  #27  
Old 06-27-2012, 10:17 AM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harazzer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Oh the other hypocrite chimes in, how adorable. No this is Sominus, i didnt do anything as unforgivable as drawing nudity (lol) I just find it amusing how you and nietzche shit on bda in every thread after being members for 350 days of the last calendar year.
Do people need to get beat into BDA and get tats?

I have never seen those two shit on BDA they defend BDA often, just like I do (or used to). Maybe they don't agree with everything you spew but that doesn't mean they are shitting on you.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #28  
Old 06-27-2012, 10:28 AM
knix knix is offline
Sarnak

knix's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 394
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harazzer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Oh the other hypocrite chimes in, how adorable. No this is Sominus,.......(snip)I just find it amusing how you and nietzche shit on bda in every thread after being members for 350 days of the last calendar year.
Thank you for Identifying who you were, because I thought you liked posting with anonymity for obvious reasons.

*Looks around for shit she left here*

Nope I don't see any, therefore you must be quite nuts. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news to you.

Refer to this post http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...&postcount=245 for information on the Draco encounter,

quote from it


[Wed Jun 13 01:35:20 2012] Appointed TMO raid leader tells you, 'remind them afterwards to not kite stuff till their force arrives =p. we let them take the chance they shouldn't have gotten'

If TMO would have pulled Draco off of the train and killed him, I'd have said good stuff since that's how it was ruled a few times in the past. BDA would have cried that they had FTE due to training and I'd have told them tough shit. The situation is prevented from happening again at least due to training. So something other than hurt butts came out of it.
-----------------------------------------

In summary Ambrotos awarded it to BDA based on TMO telling him to go ahead and let BDA have it. In this instance TMO was bending over backwards for guild relations as clearly to us that it was tagged by TMO off extended kite .

Could TMO have challenged FTE on this mob and won, perhaps, it wasnt known to either guild that the logs weren't working.
Could have TMO taken the mob back after it was tagged off our monk by BDA -- YES, could have but- for guild relations it was decided to go ahead and let BDA have a shot at it AS there were not very many BDA in attendance, but after it was reset by Ambrotos because it falling under the earth - BDA did get more of an advantage as more BDA in zone to kill it , plus time for buffing and the Train that BDA had brought to themselves wouldn't be a factor in the reset killing of draco.

summary of summary TMO did something nice, and still there is hate.
Reminder this thread is about this draco killing.
  #29  
Old 06-27-2012, 10:40 AM
Harrison Harrison is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 2,320
Default

So wait, you think TMO kiting a mob around(against raid rules) and bowing out when caught is "doing something nice"? lol...udumbro
  #30  
Old 06-27-2012, 10:54 AM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So wait, you think TMO kiting a mob around(against raid rules) and bowing out when caught is "doing something nice"? lol...udumbro
Derp, BDA was kiting the mob not TMO. Take off your TMO shaped goggles.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.