Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-05-2011, 05:02 PM
stonetz stonetz is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 82
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Korisek [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There's a priest of order NPC walking around Qeynos on the blue server that can reverse PvP status.

Perhaps something similar can be put in?

Problem is people would only go itemloot when they wanted to go gank people snag some shit and then switch back. If it's not all or nothing it will take the fun out of it / get abused etc.

Another option might be an area / zone whatever that was item loot enabled. I don't know how hard that would be to code, doesn't seem that bad to me but I'm not balls deep in the code.

hell maybe even a /itemduel but I'm more concerned with essential mechanics than item loot. It can wait.
__________________
Stonetz
Gnome Wizard Red99

Stone <Pandemonium>
Retired Druid from Tallon Zek
  #2  
Old 11-05-2011, 06:49 PM
oldfish oldfish is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Love the idea, I can see it being somewhat exploited some how. I'd say a shitty and cheap way to take advantage would be to have a gank squad with say 2 or 3 non item loot chars and a naked wiz with item loot enabled. They beat on an item loot enabled person running around, the naked or almost naked wiz takes the kill shot and grabs the loot.

No risk to the gank squad at all and easy kills for easy loot. People say "this sucks balls, I want to go back to normal" they can't and they quit.


If there's a way to make it work without people abusing it then I'd be all for it but I don't see it.
Then they could code it like a PVE kill. He has to do the most dmg for item loot to kick in. Still a naked wiz could still do most of the dmg... but at least youd know who to go for first lol

Thanks for pointing out a flaw scenario though, i wouldnt want this in if it can be easily exploited
  #3  
Old 11-05-2011, 04:47 PM
Naez 4.20 Naez 4.20 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: s0cal
Posts: 99
Send a message via ICQ to Naez 4.20 Send a message via AIM to Naez 4.20 Send a message via MSN to Naez 4.20 Send a message via Yahoo to Naez 4.20
Default

Yea it's gotta be an all or nothing type of thing
  #4  
Old 11-09-2011, 04:45 PM
oldfish oldfish is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 417
Default

Bumping this because people with 50s running alt twinks will enjoy this, and its on a voluntary basis so no tears.
  #5  
Old 11-09-2011, 05:41 PM
Gremel Gremel is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 86
Default lewtz vs no lewtz

I didn't mind item loot on Rallos. It made you really think about what you were going to equip and it kept some twinking in check -- do you really want to risk a pack of lvl 9 zerging you and taking your super-awesome-trade-able-item-of-ridiculousness on your de-leveled-barbarian-rogue ganker...

Item loot (a single equipped non-weapon item, or item in primary inventory slots i.e. not in a bag) encourages equiping no-drop items and using trade skill created items (easily replaceable). it makes pvp a little more dangerous (you will lose stuff as well as xp and coin). it will reign in rampant twinking later in the life of the server. it also encourages bagging, zoning, gating, etc.

so there are benefits and drawbacks. I for one will mourn the loss of the attitude: "well this is all junk, better just take their pants 'cause it's funny"
__________________
  #6  
Old 11-09-2011, 09:21 PM
zixxer zixxer is offline
Orc


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 38
Default

Why would anyone be against this idea, don't turn in the damn book if you don't want too...
  #7  
Old 11-10-2011, 10:59 AM
Muaar Muaar is offline
Sarnak

Muaar's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 334
Default

NOT CLASSIC
__________________
  #8  
Old 11-10-2011, 06:38 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,465
Default

Should just be single item loot anyway. People tend to be able to bag their best item first anyways. This xp loss thing is .... bad :P.
  #9  
Old 03-07-2012, 04:57 PM
oldfish oldfish is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 417
Default

Bumping this again because i think its a good compromise between full on item loot and no item loot at all.
  #10  
Old 03-07-2012, 05:09 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,465
Default

Shoulda just put it in from the start, same people'd be here.

If you think a melee twink with jboots isn't dangerous.. you never met Huff / my SK twinks on live.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.