Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-28-2011, 07:42 PM
Galacticus Galacticus is offline
Fire Giant

Galacticus's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 988
Default

Looks good.
__________________
[/CENTER]
[/CENTER]
  #2  
Old 10-28-2011, 07:43 PM
Rushmore Rushmore is offline
Planar Protector

Rushmore's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Will be patching this in either tonight or tomorrow along with other stuff. Wanted to give a heads up on how it will work. We might be disabling the dynamic system, but implementing the new range scaling.

Levels 1 to 19 will have a 4 level PvP Range.
Levels 20 to 39 will have a 6 level PvP Range.
Levels 40 to 60 will have an 8 level PvP Range.

Combat will be based on the lowest level's range (a level 15 and level 20 won't be able to attack eachother,even though the 20 has a 6 level pvp range, the 15 only has a 4, attack disallowed).
Rogean I know this isn't an issue at the moment. But please think about adding FFA zones. Especially when Kunark drops. 60's not being able to stop 50's from raiding in planes is retarded. Also Dragons like Naggy and Vox shouldn't be limited to level 53. They should be opened to 60 and if possible buffed at that time to make them even harder to kill.

This prevents a lot of nonsense that you won't end up having to deal with.

FFA zones are a must! Please! Your our only hope.
__________________
The Rushmore Doctrine

Quote:
Originally Posted by GOD
"I will honor those who honor Me, but those who despise Me will be disgraced." HCSB 1 Samuel 2:30
  #3  
Old 10-28-2011, 10:08 PM
Gnar Gnar is offline
Kobold

Gnar's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rushmore [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Rogean I know this isn't an issue at the moment. But please think about adding FFA zones. Especially when Kunark drops. 60's not being able to stop 50's from raiding in planes is retarded. Also Dragons like Naggy and Vox shouldn't be limited to level 53. They should be opened to 60 and if possible buffed at that time to make them even harder to kill.

This prevents a lot of nonsense that you won't end up having to deal with.

FFA zones are a must! Please! Your our only hope.
More good ideas like these and less bad ideas like trying to get shinaba into the guild.
__________________
Gnar the Champion box 3.0
Greebo
Leader of No Homo
<Holocaust>
VZTZ
  #4  
Old 10-29-2011, 11:08 AM
Goobles Goobles is offline
Planar Protector

Goobles's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: A shoe
Posts: 1,518
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rushmore [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Rogean I know this isn't an issue at the moment. But please think about adding FFA zones. Especially when Kunark drops. 60's not being able to stop 50's from raiding in planes is retarded. Also Dragons like Naggy and Vox shouldn't be limited to level 53. They should be opened to 60 and if possible buffed at that time to make them even harder to kill.

This prevents a lot of nonsense that you won't end up having to deal with.

FFA zones are a must! Please! Your our only hope.

For starters, it will be 1-50 for a while. Secondly. If you are going to stay level 50-51 during Kunark to avoid pvp so you can raid, you are pussy little bitch, and are going to need a lot more bodies than the level 60 raiders (which won't happen). Just saying. It's a shitty hypothetical scenario.
__________________

it's like you make the atomic bomb (server) and you don't want to let other countries (guilds) have nuclear secrets (under the radar information). it's gm's business and no one else's or else everyone gets nuked. letting Iran or North Korea beta test and keep the successful nukes, makes other countries uncomfortable.
  #5  
Old 10-28-2011, 07:45 PM
Crenshinabon Crenshinabon is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 468
Default

I would hope that the raid zones and endgame dungeons would be FFA!~
  #6  
Old 10-28-2011, 08:13 PM
gloinz gloinz is offline
Planar Protector

gloinz's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,003
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crenshinabon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I would hope that the raid zones and endgame dungeons would be FFA!~
they should be ffa and COMPLETELY gm free similar to the idea behind veeshan peak gameplan
__________________
Griefer of Greenie, 1999-2003
PvP Champ, 2003-2005
Senior Vice President, <PvP Champs> 2006-Present
  #7  
Old 10-28-2011, 10:05 PM
Gnar Gnar is offline
Kobold

Gnar's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Will be patching this in either tonight or tomorrow along with other stuff. Wanted to give a heads up on how it will work. We might be disabling the dynamic system, but implementing the new range scaling.

Levels 1 to 19 will have a 4 level PvP Range.
Levels 20 to 39 will have a 6 level PvP Range.
Levels 40 to 60 will have an 8 level PvP Range.

Combat will be based on the lowest level's range (a level 15 and level 20 won't be able to attack eachother,even though the 20 has a 6 level pvp range, the 15 only has a 4, attack disallowed).
Havent been able to test this rogean but on vztz you couldnt kick or bash or backstab someone who was -+5 levels behind or ahead of you. IE lvl 50 warrior couldnt bash a 44 (who was still in pvp range) but auto attack worked fine.
__________________
Gnar the Champion box 3.0
Greebo
Leader of No Homo
<Holocaust>
VZTZ
  #8  
Old 10-28-2011, 10:09 PM
Rogean Rogean is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Rogean's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,393
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gnar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Havent been able to test this rogean but on vztz you couldnt kick or bash or backstab someone who was -+5 levels behind or ahead of you. IE lvl 50 warrior couldnt bash a 44 (who was still in pvp range) but auto attack worked fine.
Then how about testing before talking.
__________________
Sean "Rogean" Norton
Project 1999 Co-Manager

Project 1999 Setup Guide
  #9  
Old 10-28-2011, 11:10 PM
Rust1d? Rust1d? is offline
Banned


Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 890
Default

Any thought of having pvp starting at lv 6? Just seems to be logical to have new pvp'ers have a little wiggle room and not get insta ganked by level 5's etc at lv 1
  #10  
Old 10-29-2011, 01:15 AM
Pudge Pudge is offline
Planar Protector

Pudge's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,523
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rust1d? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Any thought of having pvp starting at lv 6? Just seems to be logical to have new pvp'ers have a little wiggle room and not get insta ganked by level 5's etc at lv 1
i agree. it lets new players make friends and get used to the server at lower levels


also: FFA raid zones pls (guk isnt a raid zone. but maybe it could have FFA AREAS like evil eye area)
Last edited by Pudge; 10-29-2011 at 01:18 AM..
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.