Putting the Pieces Together - Page 3

Autotune · #1 09-03-2011, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ah, so they're making VP different here to be more challenging or something?

every time they release anything, there are bugs that are different. Pathing bugs, mobs not using certain abilities/raid target los issues and so forth.

Things that take time to learn and find out. However, if you have all that and have been playing with it for week/s before the actual release of VP. You have a great leg up and don't have to worry about reporting it until your competition becomes aware.

Only some times will they change things on purpose to make the game more challenging. I won't go into why these things get changed tho, most already know.

Knuckle · #2 09-03-2011, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

to answer your question. No you don't.

VP of ~10yrs ago will not =/= VP on p99.

Having the p99 VP copy would vastly benefit a guild over having an exact copy of the VP build that was on live back when it was first released.

Some people tend to forget how much is different on p99 as opposed to live "back in the day"

Chanur · #3 09-03-2011, 12:31 PM

VP will be close enough, if anyone did VP back in the day they would know the basics.

Autotune · #4 09-03-2011, 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chanur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

VP will be close enough, if anyone did VP back in the day they would know the basics.

This is where i'd normally say, "Quit being stupid."

However, I know it's not possible for you.

Chanur · #5 09-03-2011, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is where i'd normally say, "Quit being stupid."

However, I know it's not possible for you.

Considering you didn't even play when the original VP was relevant I would suggest you shut the fuck up you clueless fuck wit.

Autotune · #6 09-03-2011, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chanur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Considering you didn't even play when the original VP was relevant I would suggest you shut the fuck up you clueless fuck wit.

Oh, I wasn't aware I didn't play then. Thanks for correcting my past experiences for me.

yaaaflow · #7 09-03-2011, 01:01 PM

Whys he so obsessed with calling anyone taking the non-TMO view on these situations a TR member then?

Diggles · #8 09-03-2011, 01:02 PM

Same reason Harrison hops on the dick of anyone who says something bad about TR

They're nobodies that want to cling to some ounce of fame; by being a douche.

although I don't mind slathar

yaaaflow · #9 09-03-2011, 01:05 PM

Yeah but literally nobody likes Harrison or respects his opinions on either side of any argument, whereas there are several TMO members doing the exact same nonsense as Slathar?

Uthgaard · #10 09-03-2011, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So I don't pay much attention to server drama, but I was curious about the whole Uthgaard thing. This is my understanding of the situation.

Some person was supposedly testing in VP to get info ahead of time to give TR an advantage. Nevermind that this info is 10 years old and can be found in any one of a hundred places on the internet. This would really only affect 2 guilds currently, and most of us don't give a shit about their petty drama. So Uthgaard calls this person out, with or without real evidence, but in the wrong place. He makes it public instead of keeping it between the server owners. He gets called out on this bs, and rage quits because of perceived favoritism on an issue that the vast majority of the server doesn't care about. Do I have this pretty much correct?

The "wrong place" was in the staff forums. Not in public. But without a vbulletin license, the staff forums might as well be public.