Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-02-2011, 03:04 PM
tefog tefog is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 373
Default

lol
  #22  
Old 09-02-2011, 03:09 PM
yaaaflow yaaaflow is offline
Sarnak

yaaaflow's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 299
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tefog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What bothers me is just the unequal treatment we players are getting. If it were me i'd be banned. If it were someone else they'd be suspended.
Where is this unequal treatment talk coming from? In the vast vast majority of cases cheating = ban. In this particular case, due to the mass number of accounts they caught they decided suspension + punishment + proving they would catch anyone mq2/myseqing in the future was enough. If you were caught in this bunch you would be suspended, not banned, just like everyone else. You can surely argue that the cheaters should have been punished harder but I don't see how you can say it is unequal punishment since all cheaters caught in this way got the same punishment.
  #23  
Old 09-02-2011, 03:13 PM
Labyrrinth Labyrrinth is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: St Louis
Posts: 173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yaaaflow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Where is this unequal treatment talk coming from? In the vast vast majority of cases cheating = ban. In this particular case, due to the mass number of accounts they caught they decided suspension + punishment + proving they would catch anyone mq2/myseqing in the future was enough. If you were caught in this bunch you would be suspended, not banned, just like everyone else. You can surely argue that the cheaters should have been punished harder but I don't see how you can say it is unequal punishment since all cheaters caught in this way got the same punishment.
I think people are coupling the cheating issue with other issues that have occurred this past week. Xzerion and VP, Uthgaards reasons for leaving, and probably a few other things that I'm not aware of.

Combine all those, and where those issues point make a lot of folks feel there's unequal treatment on the server.
__________________
India - cleric
Labyrrinth - enchanter
  #24  
Old 09-02-2011, 03:20 PM
Kruel Kruel is offline
Sarnak

Kruel's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Labyrrinth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think people are coupling the cheating issue with other issues that have occurred this past week. Xzerion and VP, Uthgaards reasons for leaving, and probably a few other things that I'm not aware of.

Combine all those, and where those issues point make a lot of folks feel there's unequal treatment on the server.
Nilbog and rogean HAVE posted. They said they had already done an internal investigation and Xzerion is clean. Uthgaard then raged about this (and other things). Uthgaard then let the logs get out and onto R&F. Also how did Uthgaard have the time to make a toon in EC to bash another Dev?

It is very clear= Uthgaard is a GREAT dev.
Uthgaard= hothead. (im a hothead in RL so dont take it to offensively.)
  #25  
Old 09-02-2011, 03:23 PM
Labyrrinth Labyrrinth is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: St Louis
Posts: 173
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kruel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Nilbog and rogean HAVE posted. They said they had already done an internal investigation and Xzerion is clean. Uthgaard then raged about this (and other things). Uthgaard then let the logs get out and onto R&F. Also how did Uthgaard have the time to make a toon in EC to bash another Dev?

It is very clear= Uthgaard is a GREAT dev.
Uthgaard= hothead. (im a hothead in RL so dont take it to offensively.)
No one said they HADN'T posted.
In addition, just because something is posted doesn't make it true.
__________________
India - cleric
Labyrrinth - enchanter
  #26  
Old 09-02-2011, 03:23 PM
tefog tefog is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 373
Default

I meant unequal treatment to all those who were caught and banned before this huge hacker revelation
  #27  
Old 09-02-2011, 03:35 PM
Kruel Kruel is offline
Sarnak

Kruel's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 357
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Labyrrinth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No one said they HADN'T posted.
In addition, just because something is posted doesn't make it true.
The title of this thread is :
I love how Rogean and Nilbog havent responded. Im simply saying they did post. And Uthgaard didnt like the response.
  #28  
Old 09-02-2011, 04:11 PM
tefog tefog is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 373
Default

You know what.. Now that I thought about all this. Though I am upset about the decision, I did not create this server. Nor did I take hundreds of hours of my life to code and patch and add content. So to Nilbog and Rogean, I am sorry. Though I do not agree with the decision. It is not my decision to make, nor my place to make accusations.

Thats the note I want to end this thread with.
  #29  
Old 09-02-2011, 04:15 PM
Feachie Feachie is offline
Fire Giant

Feachie's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: ciudad de los angeles, aztlán
Posts: 733
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yaaaflow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Where is this unequal treatment talk coming from? In the vast vast majority of cases cheating = ban. In this particular case, due to the mass number of accounts they caught they decided suspension + punishment + proving they would catch anyone mq2/myseqing in the future was enough. If you were caught in this bunch you would be suspended, not banned, just like everyone else. You can surely argue that the cheaters should have been punished harder but I don't see how you can say it is unequal punishment since all cheaters caught in this way got the same punishment.
exhibit a, from 8/30/11: http://i52.tinypic.com/t8nl76.jpg

exhibit b, from 9/1/11: http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/3204/eq000057.jpg

2 weeks goes by so quickly!
  #30  
Old 09-02-2011, 04:18 PM
yaaaflow yaaaflow is offline
Sarnak

yaaaflow's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 299
Default

Accounts which were caught using MQ2/myseq were suspended. If the Trax account did not get caught using mq2/myseq why would it be suspended?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.