Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Bugs

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-12-2026, 03:56 PM
Delfofthebla Delfofthebla is offline
Orc


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 42
Default

Rangers bout to be a lot less fun to play. Great work making things less interesting as always team. Keep up the "good" work.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-12-2026, 08:17 PM
Swish Swish is offline
Planar Protector

Swish's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 20,268
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Delfofthebla [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Rangers bout to be a lot less fun to play. Great work making things less interesting as always team. Keep up the "good" work.
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-12-2026, 04:18 PM
CrazyPro CrazyPro is offline
Sarnak

CrazyPro's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Oggok
Posts: 333
Default

It ain't much but I found this: https://web.archive.org/web/20001018...s.asp?ID=82328

Quote:
Us rangers get critical hit in archery. To recognize how valuable this is, i'll set an example . At lvl 9 , i was able to score 32 damage all the time with my high archery skill with a rough elm bow. better than what a halberd hits. > )
---

Brad McQuaid didn't seem to like the idea of archery being good. https://web.archive.org/web/20010304...adlog4-5_1.asp

Quote:
<Uhgs> Aradune, there are so many people asking for Archery to be a viable primary attack...can't you find any way to make it balanced but primary? They would all LOVE it....
<Aradune> uhgs: no, i really don't want to make archery a primary combat skill, sorry
Quote:
<Elderan> Aradune: NO one is asking for archery to be a pri combat skill, just as an ADDED skill for rangers while combat, IE combat archery
<Aradune> elderan: to make it viable for what you guys want, it would be a primary combat skill
<Aradune> and then it would be used instead of melee
<Aradune> and then EQ wouldn't be EQ
__________________
Green:
Rimurok 60 Ogre Shadowknight <Castle>
Nilwen 60 Ogre Druid <Castle>
Pygnomaniac 4 GnOgre Wizard <Castle>
Mirnimhirnsvirf 13 Cancermancer <Castle>
__________________
Green: ACTIVE
Blue: INACTIVE
Red: INACTIVE

Quarm is love Quarm is life
Last edited by CrazyPro; 01-12-2026 at 04:24 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-12-2026, 04:29 PM
kingcowboy kingcowboy is offline
Skeleton


Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 16
Default

Crit damage seems to be off

Please take a look at this thread. I've never had a crit this high even while main handing earthshaker

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=423813
__________________
Gokai - 60 Wizard
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-12-2026, 04:34 PM
CrazyPro CrazyPro is offline
Sarnak

CrazyPro's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Oggok
Posts: 333
Default

https://web.archive.org/web/20010824...html?item=4083

Quote:
RE: rangers By: Nitrouz,
2 posts
Posted @ Thu, Mar 8th 3:39 PM 2001 Score: Decent[3.00]
you are very wrong. i use summoned arrows from my tolans bracer, and those are only 3 damage. i have gotten crits up to 144

this also takes into account the double-damage factor when still and not rooted... i have crit for over 100 when no double-damage was added.

AND....i use a wind saber...13/22...ONLY 13 dmg.
thats a total of 16 damage making up to 144 crit. NOW...can u imagine what i could crit with THIS?!?!? MUAHAHAHA
Quote:
Nice bow By: Methlar,
1 posts
Posted @ Tue, Aug 7th 7:32 AM 2001 Score: Decent[3.00]
Got it tonigt but can't remember what type of rat it was (not like you have a choice in choosing which ones to fight LOL). Used one disc on it before we left, using 6dmg arrows. Highest crit I got (hit for double damage) was 402, so hit it for 804 total. My guess is you can get into the 600s and 700s with disc for single shot(have seen other rangers do it).
__________________
Green:
Rimurok 60 Ogre Shadowknight <Castle>
Nilwen 60 Ogre Druid <Castle>
Pygnomaniac 4 GnOgre Wizard <Castle>
Mirnimhirnsvirf 13 Cancermancer <Castle>
__________________
Green: ACTIVE
Blue: INACTIVE
Red: INACTIVE

Quarm is love Quarm is life
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-12-2026, 09:10 PM
Ruthbader Ruthbader is online now
Kobold

Ruthbader's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 186
Default

Don't be modest sir, I see you digging out extra context.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-12-2026, 10:26 PM
Awsten_Tx Awsten_Tx is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 227
Default

From language of the patch notes, bows should have a bonus, that bonus may get doubled for stationary targets and further bonused when trueshot active.

This is likely how the fabled 1k plus velious era bowshot occurred.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-12-2026, 10:41 PM
Ennewi Ennewi is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,518
Default

https://dbsanfte.github.io/eq-archiv...-msg-74548.txt

Quote:
From -6837830754975388645
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fb739,f70d65f176b0ec3b
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb739,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-31 22:44:04 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.sta nford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!nycmny1-snh1.gtei.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.cidera. com!Cidera!cyclone.tampabay.rr.com!news-post.tampabay.rr.com!typhoon.tampabay.rr.com.POSTE D!not-for-mail
From: "Dan Harmon" <deharmon@bigfoot.com>
Newsgroups: alt.games.everquest
References: <4EbY7.219$am4.460051@bcandid.telisphere.com>
Subject: Re: Any rangers see a SOL Trueshot Stealth Nerf?
Lines: 24
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <SUcY7.236204$Ga5.43278503@typhoon.tampabay.rr.com >
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 06:44:02 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.28.47.219
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com
X-Trace: typhoon.tampabay.rr.com 1009867442 24.28.47.219 (Tue, 01 Jan 2002 01:44:02 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 01:44:02 EST
Organization: RoadRunner - TampaBay
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.games.everquest:152379


"R. Jarett Kulm" <jarettkulm@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4EbY7.219$am4.460051@bcandid.telisphere.com.. .
> Before SOL, all was great. Buffed or Boon'd (avg 200str & 200-210 dex) I
> could crit for 650-800 with /disc trueshot on doublke damage hits. I
would
> average 230-380 on normal double damage crit hits. This is with a 30/39
> 110 range velium recurve.

>
> Currently, post SOL, I am lucky to hit 650 asa max crit, and 120-240
double
> damage shots. with the /disc. I am also seeing ALOT of hits that dont
sdo
> more than the bow would do unbuffed or no /disc.
>
> Any other rangers seeing lowered damage output with their bows since SOL?
> Seems like a stealth nerf to me.

And it couldn't POSSIBLY be simply a BUG...no, it's impossible, 'cause they
ARE out to screw YOU.

/Bug it, moron.
__________________
Active MRE | MIA Mains
Active UNO | SEB | FME| EVG | SOB | LEG Alts
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-13-2026, 11:06 AM
nilbog nilbog is offline
Project Manager

nilbog's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,735
Default

Still working through this.


Non-ranger bow damage is looking much better - it is essentially the same as the Nina logs previously posted using the same level, weapon, stats and npc targets.

There is something wrong with ranger archery damage though. For example, in a brief test, double damage targets seem to take less damage than moving targets. It also seems that Trueshot 'works' for non-double hits but not for double-damage hits.

I don't want to apply a general fix for archery without considering rangers. So, more testing to do.

If there are any ranger logs, of non-Trueshot damage, that would help.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-15-2026, 11:35 AM
Awsten_Tx Awsten_Tx is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2022
Posts: 227
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Still working through this.


Non-ranger bow damage is looking much better - it is essentially the same as the Nina logs previously posted using the same level, weapon, stats and npc targets.

There is something wrong with ranger archery damage though. For example, in a brief test, double damage targets seem to take less damage than moving targets. It also seems that Trueshot 'works' for non-double hits but not for double-damage hits.

I don't want to apply a general fix for archery without considering rangers. So, more testing to do.

If there are any ranger logs, of non-Trueshot damage, that would help.
When you say ranger logs, do you need in game p99 testing or in era historical context?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.