Democrat pleads guilty to voter/election fraud

[Castle2.0]

Do you read?

Also, trees from forest. Understand?

Originally Posted by www.Justice.gov

PHILADELPHIA – United States Attorney Jennifer Arbittier Williams announced today that former U.S. Congressman Michael “Ozzie” Myers, 79, of Philadelphia, PA, pleaded guilty today to conspiracy to deprive voters of civil rights, bribery, obstruction of justice, falsification of voting records, and conspiring to illegally vote in a federal election for orchestrating schemes to fraudulently stuff the ballot boxes for specific Democratic candidates in the 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018 Pennsylvania elections.

Our argument is "This party is systematically stealing elections over multiple years." Notice the plural on "Democrat candidates" from the www.Justice.gov official release?

"Whataboutism" is a pretty weak argument. I expect as much from Botten. He's been blocked for months so I just see his brain dead drivel in other's quotes. But I expected more from you, Keeper of the Wiki.

[PRogers]

That was the idea. I did it wrong. On purpose. Wanted to see what would happen. Just changed one word.

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by PRogers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That was the idea. I did it wrong. On purpose. Wanted to see what would happen. Just changed one word.

Managed to trick the one person who didn’t realize a democrat wouldn’t post an example of democrat voting fraud if their life depended on it

Er I mean bc they don’t exist

[Botten]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Managed to trick the one person who didnÂ’t realize a democrat wouldnÂ’t post an example of democrat voting fraud if their life depended on it

Er I mean bc they donÂ’t exist

Republicans in thread butt hurt over research showing their party has the most voter fraud---

Saying yeah we knew all the time it was a poly showing how bad our party commits voter fraud with so little of a response just shows how jaw dropping brainwashed conservatives are.

They will openly accept having the worst voter fraud case in history along with 50+ researched republican guilty pleas from fellow republicans where in some cases hundreds were affected.

Castle was just icing on the cake. The guy isn't right on most of his threads and blocks those who raise relevant debate.

Edit: Wholeheartedly expect Castle's alt Zati to come online to defend him again; lol!

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Republicans in thread butt hurt over research showing their party has the most voter fraud---

Saying yeah we knew all the time it was a poly showing how bad our party commits voter fraud with so little of a response just shows how jaw dropping brainwashed conservatives are.

They will openly accept having the worst voter fraud case in history along with 50+ researched republican guilty pleas from fellow republicans where in some cases hundreds were affected.

Castle was just icing on the cake. The guy isn't right on most of his threads and blocks those who raise relevant debate.

Edit: Wholeheartedly expect Castle's alt Zati to come online to defend him again; lol!

“Oh my god there’s all this voter fraud!”

“So we should make our elections more secure then?”

“WOW SOUNDS LIKE YOU DONT WANT BLACK PEOPLE TO VOTE HUH”

[Botten]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

“Oh my god there’s all this voter fraud!”

“So we should make our elections more secure then?”

“WOW SOUNDS LIKE YOU DONT WANT BLACK PEOPLE TO VOTE HUH”

The black vote through redistricting has been disenfranchised relatively recent. Republican’s do see minorities as a voting threat.

Closing more polls in city locations… regulating hours open… refusing a national voting holiday… the manipulation by Republicans sees no end when it comes to national elections.

Hell, in the past Black voters have had problems being allowed to vote in rural conservatives areas of the nation.

But discussing triple or more valid forms of identification isn’t enough for republicans for the same reason Republicans are against everyone being legally registered to vote instead of registering constantly. They need a means to manipulate the numbered registered to vote to win.

Saying a hundred fraud cases over multiple election isn’t thousands.

But saying Republican’s are most noteworthy when it comes to numerous fraud cases they complain about isn’t grounds for a talking point to help them win more through further manipulation of the vote aimed at urban areas.

[unsunghero]

The bottom line is Twitter and YouTube already told me that our 2020 election was the most secure in US history (before Twitter was no longer getting requests straight from the government anyway, new Twitter might not say that)….and because I blindly believe Big Tech I agree the amount was insignificant

And I think that the reason that Dems wouldn’t want more election security is, if the fraud really was completely one-sided (which it’s probably not) AND also statistically insignificant, then it is useful to remain for future gotcha posts on elf forums

Just like if there was a button that would change history to put 30x the number of police officers on Capital Hill and completely prevent the Jan 6 riot, but pressing the button required a majority vote of democrats to push….the button wouldn’t get pushed

Some Dems would clutch pearls and be like “a woman died! Cops were hurt! Of course we would all want to push the button!” Nah. Sorry, I don’t buy it. It was too politicically useful to want to change, even with all those bleeding hearts

But that’s the cynic in me, I know it doesn’t apply to you fine chaps

[Botten]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The bottom line is Twitter and YouTube already told me that our 2020 election was the most secure in US history (before Twitter was no longer getting requests straight from the government anyway, new Twitter might not say that)….and because I blindly believe Big Tech I agree the amount was insignificant

And I think that the reason that Dems wouldn’t want more election security is, if the fraud really was completely one-sided (which it’s probably not) AND also statistically insignificant, then it is useful to remain for future gotcha posts on elf forums

Just like if there was a button that would change history to put 30x the number of police officers on Capital Hill and completely prevent the Jan 6 riot, but pressing the button required a majority vote of democrats to push….the button wouldn’t get pushed

Some Dems would clutch pearls and be like “a woman died! Cops were hurt! Of course we would all want to push the button!” Nah. Sorry, I don’t buy it. It was too politicically useful to want to change, even with all those bleeding hearts

But that’s the cynic in me, I know it doesn’t apply to you fine chaps

Twitter and Youtube care about profit.
Social media (see 8chan) has been taken down due to some crazed alt right posting their manifesto. Can you really blame some of them leaning away from the crazy then allowing to post it. Crazy on a soapbox only desensitizes and causes a more inclusive crazy.

But in the end they are private and make their own judgement calls.

You are right about elf forums not meaning much as a gotcha moment. The user base represents a lot of the older generation who aren't going to change. But brainwashed deep rooted conservatives have a big problem on their hands.

Their image to a more educated generation Z that sees first hand their scandals and as more rural uneducated locations get uplifted the vote swings harder for progressive change.

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Twitter and Youtube care about profit.
Social media (see 8chan) has been taken down due to some crazed alt right posting their manifesto. Can you really blame some of them leaning away from the crazy then allowing to post it. Crazy on a soapbox only desensitizes and causes a more inclusive crazy.

But in the end they are private and make their own judgement calls.

Interesting contrast of ideas. When I hear crazy, I am repulsed by it. And I have a belief that most people have some inherent good and logic in them and are able to come to their own decisions, such as being repulsed by crazy. So I don’t care as much about whether crazy has a soapbox

Just take what you said about big rich corporations - they make their own judgement calls - and apply it to individuals. And that’s how I feel

I guess we just disagree on the outcome. I think individuals should be allowed to have all the information even stupid crazy extreme shit and make the right decision and you don’t trust them to, but you sorta trust the rich corporations to

[unsunghero]

^
Yea I just covered that