Charm mechanic changes next patch?

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by derpcake2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So do you think things should be changed based on many posts by a few?

We can disagree on that. I don't see what point you are trying to make if not that.

IDK, some people were posting earlier as if they had definitive knowledge of how the back end mechanics worked during trilogy.

I guess we'll see how the emergent game play is after the change has settled and see whether or not it feels more classic.

[Jimjam]

It would be a little sad if the meta remains exactly the same, just with worse luck on breaks. If that is the case, and it feels less classic, then I suppose a revert would be in order.

[derpcake2]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It would be a little sad if the meta remains exactly the same, just with worse luck on breaks. If that is the case, and it feels less classic, then I suppose a revert would be in order.

Reverts don't happen, you also know that.

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by derpcake2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Reverts don't happen, you also know that.

You’ve been asking me what I think, so I’ve been replying with what I think should happen. Sorry I’m not in charge?

As reverts generally don’t happen I suppose the dev team only implements changes they feel are a step closer to classic and the arguments, even if they lacked what you might consider hard evidence, were persuasive enough to make the decision to change.

[derpcake2]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You’ve been asking me what I think, so I’ve been replying with what I think should happen. Sorry I’m not in charge?

As reverts generally don’t happen I suppose the dev team only implements changes they feel are a step closer to classic and the arguments, even if they lacked what you might consider hard evidence, were persuasive enough to make the decision to change.

No you are saying "if its wrong they can revert it".

Which is bullshit, since reverts don't happen, which you admit.

Let me add a smiley and hope this info helps [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You (poorly) evaded every question and it is tiresome. Try taking lessons from Loramin, I know you are buddies.

[Jimjam]

Perhaps you would like to go back over your questions and try repeating them rephrased as I don’t seem to have answered them in the way you were hoping - maybe I’ve misunderstood?

[derpcake2]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Perhaps you would like to go back over your questions and try repeating them rephrased as I don’t seem to have answered them in the way you were hoping - maybe I’ve misunderstood?

Thank you but no [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If I wanted to spend hundreds of hours arguing with people in bad faith, I'd have taken it up with Loramin earlier.

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by derpcake2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thank you but no [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If I wanted to spend hundreds of hours arguing with people in bad faith, I'd have taken it up with Loramin earlier.

My apologies. I thought we were having a discussion to explore each others thoughts, I didn’t realise you were trying to argue with me in bad faith. Sorry.

I’ll try to prepare some bad faith arguments for next time. I’ll keep them punchy so you won’t need to spend hundreds of hours at it!

[derpcake2]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My apologies. I thought we were having a discussion to explore each others thoughts, I didn’t realise you were trying to argue with me in bad faith. Sorry.

I’ll try to prepare some bad faith arguments for next time. I’ll keep them punchy so you won’t need to spend hundreds of hours at it!

I phrased it like that since you'd take that bait.

You understood perfectly well what I said, and are supporting what I meant with the quoted post [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by derpcake2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I wanted to spend hundreds of hours arguing with people in bad faith, I'd have taken it up with Loramin