Learn Me Good

[quido]

Yeah I really don't care about the one relatively worthless item I lost today and am not really trying to make an issue of it; I do not seek an appeal. I seek merely to clarify the issue so that I know whether I'm in the right or the wrong going forward. The incident that occurred with Eashan this morning was pretty understandable on both sides of the table. I've always liked Eashan personally and that hasn't changed today because of a stupid Jade Mace. The truth is I would have pulled that mob regardless - named or not, mace or not. I'm more concerned with people threatening to be a waste of time and space over one trash exp mob when there are multiple others up. Get over it and pull something else, in my opinion. Or put the furious effort you apply to crying in /say towards pulling more foes.

[Asher]

How many camps are in Crypt in Old Sebilis?

I understand that people can claim named but in every Crypt group I have ever done crypt takes the 4 rooms, the roaming cube and emp.

If I walk in and see that Baron Yosig or PH is up can I park in the room and claim the camp? This would obviously be a dickish thing to do but I am curious how the rules would apply to a camp like that.

Asher

[Zereh]

Originally Posted by Uthgaard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

By the time they've blown their whine wad

hahah <3

[Jjlent]

Originally Posted by Uthgaard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Fact is, one side will always come out pissed about the result of any camp dispute, and claim injustice, or favoritism, or that we suspended you for something you said in guildchat when it was really the juvenile hate tells you were sending, or whatever else justifies it to the rocks rattling around in their head. If you can't reach a resolution on your own, you really don't have any room to complain when someone else comes and reaches it for you.

hahahahahahaha i lol'd uth

[Uthgaard]

Originally Posted by Mardur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And here is the entire point of this thread.

GM-A says the rules are that if a named has multiple spawn points, it's first to engage.

Player-A pulls a named in KC (which has multiple spawn points), kills it, gets loot. Player-B who happened to be camping nearby petitions. GM-B shows up.

GM-B says that Player-A shouldn't have pulled the named and Player-A gives the drop to Player-B

GM-B effectively undermines the rules stated by GM-A because all CSR have their own set of rules that contradict other CSRs' rules.

Fill in GM-A and GM-B with names, and one specific example. I'm calling you out on it, and I guarantee you can't do it without finagling details as described here:

Originally Posted by Uthgaard [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

And after that hour, everyone present will spam whoever made whatever decision with tells isolating single lines or words from the rules to try to twist the situation in their favor. You can't always break a camp dispute decision down into a single facet. It usually involves a comprehensive understanding of the situation, and in most cases, a lot of guessing over who's telling how much of the truth.

[Seaweedpimp]

Usually it wouldnt even matter, Its allways top guild vs top guild, but neither are all over crypt like they used to when it came available.

[Rejuvenation]

It seems pretty obvious to me that crypt camp contains the 5 named mobs but not emperor. If you can kill emperor as well, wonderful, but there's no reason a group can't move past you to claim the emp camp.