![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Is it time for war? | |||
| Time for war 100% |
|
15 | 23.08% |
| No war please |
|
24 | 36.92% |
| My body is ready |
|
3 | 4.62% |
| New Red server please |
|
8 | 12.31% |
| Forum Trannies |
|
9 | 13.85% |
| Wasnt cool to assasinate a general |
|
10 | 15.38% |
| We need oil |
|
4 | 6.15% |
| Unavoidable |
|
8 | 12.31% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 65. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
Iran is protecting the Dome of the Rock against Zionists who want to destroy it. That's why they're pushing for war because the US is cucked to Israel and has been fighting their wars for decades.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
Good thing about a rando unnecessary war is that it'll have massive consequences for the carbon content of the atmosphere and ocean at this point.
#makeeverywhereAustralianow | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Invading Iran is going to be Vietnam 2: Clusterfuck Boogaloo, only even worse. That country is a miserable shithole of some of the worst terrain on earth, with a large fraction of its populace indoctrinated religious zealots and with 40+ years to prepare for a moment of invasion that they knew was coming while watching their neighbors undergo the same thing - and how to make it as difficult as possible.
This will be a nightmare beyond your imagination if we actually invade. And you're not going to pry them out of those mountains without doing that. Best case scenario is we blow some stuff up, declare victory, then fuck off. But even then, that's not really going to change anything. Nevermind that we're the ones responsible for all of this in the first place, considering we overthrew their actual democratic government to institute the Shah, who directly spawned the current shithole. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
HAHAHAHA THOSE BITCHES TOTALLY CAVED!!1!!
They fired some rickety bullshit into a giant open airfield, then they ran back to their fucking holes and started yelling no mas. Harsh revenge! | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Iran isn't messing with us, we are trying to justify a war against them as part of a long-running plan to expand globalism through American hegemony. It's already been proven that the Iraq and Afghanistan occupations were justified based on lies; don't fall for the same bullshit again.
"PNAC's first public act was to release a "Statement of Principles" on June 3, 1997. The statement had 25 signers, including project members and outside supporters (see Signatories to Statement of Principles). It described the United States as the "world's pre-eminent power," and said that the nation faced a challenge to "shape a new century favorable to American principles and interests." In order to achieve this goal, the statement's signers called for significant increases in defense spending, and for the promotion of "political and economic freedom abroad." It said the United States should strengthen ties with its democratic allies, "challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values," and preserve and extend "an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles." Calling for a "Reaganite" policy of "military strength and moral clarity," it concluded that PNAC's principles were necessary "if the United States is to build on the successes of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next."" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projec...erican_Century "Because I had been through the Pentagon right after 9/11. About ten days after 9/11, I went through the Pentagon and I saw Secretary Rumsfeld and Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. I went downstairs just to say hello to some of the people on the Joint Staff who used to work for me, and one of the generals called me in. He said, "Sir, you've got to come in and talk to me a second." I said, "Well, you're too busy." He said, "No, no." He says, "We've made the decision we're going to war with Iraq." This was on or about the 20th of September. I said, "We're going to war with Iraq? Why?" He said, "I don't know." He said, "I guess they don't know what else to do." So I said, "Well, did they find some information connecting Saddam to al-Qaeda?" He said, "No, no." He says, "There's nothing new that way. They just made the decision to go to war with Iraq." He said, "I guess it's like we don't know what to do about terrorists, but we've got a good military and we can take down governments." And he said, "I guess if the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem has to look like a nail." So I came back to see him a few weeks later, and by that time we were bombing in Afghanistan. I said, "Are we still going to war with Iraq?" And he said, "Oh, it's worse than that." He reached over on his desk. He picked up a piece of paper. And he said, "I just got this down from upstairs" -- meaning the Secretary of Defense's office -- "today." And he said, "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran." I said, "Is it classified?" He said, "Yes, sir." I said, "Well, don't show it to me." And I saw him a year or so ago, and I said, "You remember that?" He said, "Sir, I didn't show you that memo! I didn't show it to you!"" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8ityb0Ips4
__________________
Jignutz, gnome necro of the 50th drama thread
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
|||
|
80 million civilians, many of them my family. I’m not sure what the animus against Iran is, but you rednecks really need Jesus. I fear he doesn’t know your name
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|