Quote:
Originally Posted by zillabunny
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Wouldnt they both have to pick a single room the other can't touch and the rest would all be fte Until another group came in to claim another room?
|
By a strict reading of the PnP and Camp Rules, yes. But you have to understand the staff didn't make the Camp Rules page: a random player did. I dug through old forum searches and compiled it from various assorted GM posts ... posts they'd never intended to be used in a rules document.
Now of course, if they hated it they'd make me take it down: I suspect they just feel ambivalent about it. And the reason for that is
not that they hate the players knowing the rules, it's that they want people to know the
actual rules.
As I said, there's a third piece to those rules, GM Fiat, and it could be argued that it's the most important. So the staff doesn't want the Camp Rules page to make anyone to forget that:
Quote:
Originally Posted by loramin
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
|
That's why I brought up the Seb Crypt. It's been "adjudicated"
thoroughly here in the forums, more than just about any spot (thanks to one especially dedicated soloer of it who got in repeated public camp disputes) ... and yet as I said,
despite what the "written rules" say, I think if a GM got a petition from a soloer trying to break up an established full group there ... I'm honestly not sure it would play out strictly "by the book". I think the GM Fiat gray area contains rules that treat groups differently some of the time.