Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Rants and Flames

View Poll Results: Which Zek server was the toughest to play?
Sullon 57 40.71%
Tallon 19 13.57%
Rallos 50 35.71%
Vallon 14 10.00%
Voters: 140. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-04-2011, 10:25 AM
Envious Envious is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 770
Default

Again, Macken fails at structuring a question...

/facepalm

Should read, for the answer he wants anyway, which server was the most hardcore / extreme... In which case it should be Sullon > Rallos... maybe.

Now that I think about it, toughest to play might have been evil team Vallon / Tallon... it was 9v1 for most of us. Non stop fighting alliance everywhere you went. But between Nek and Grobb there werent many alliance, so we usually ran Guk...

I dunno, Rallos being the original makes me think it was the toughest to play. Learning content + pvp = hard...

I dunno, tough call, FFA or 2v1? Thats the question imo.
  #22  
Old 05-04-2011, 12:18 PM
Doors Doors is offline
Planar Protector

Doors's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 2,934
Default

So its agreed then? Macken is fail? Thought I was the only person who knew.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drakaris View Post
You can be my squire once you can bench half of what I can.
  #23  
Old 05-04-2011, 01:31 PM
Knightmare Knightmare is offline
Kobold

Knightmare's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 196
Default

Rallos Zek. And not because of item loot.

It didn't matter what "team" you were on, there was no team. No safe race or safe zone. A pure free for all kill target means the guy next to you could be lvling or could be buying gear off you one moment, and turn around and kill you the next. You were not safe from anyone. Anywhere. Ever. Not even in your own starting zone next to a member of your own race.. nobody.

In fact on Rallos we called those people Kinslayers. Likely no term like this existed on the other servers, because you were safe from your own race, or your own team.
__________________
~Knitemare T`Knite~
~Harbingers of Thule~

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uthgaard
I don't come into McDonalds and criticize your work.
  #24  
Old 05-04-2011, 05:23 PM
Macken Macken is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Envious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Again, Macken fails at structuring a question...

/facepalm

Should read, for the answer he wants anyway, which server was the most hardcore / extreme... In which case it should be Sullon > Rallos... maybe.

Now that I think about it, toughest to play might have been evil team Vallon / Tallon... it was 9v1 for most of us. Non stop fighting alliance everywhere you went. But between Nek and Grobb there werent many alliance, so we usually ran Guk...

I dunno, Rallos being the original makes me think it was the toughest to play. Learning content + pvp = hard...

I dunno, tough call, FFA or 2v1? Thats the question imo.
I'm sorry you and Doors got caught in my troll net. But facts are facts. The poll question could have been structured in any number of ways for SZ to win.
I just arbitrarily chose the words i did.

The whole poll is a troll. Everyone knows SZ was the top server to play. This is only a poll to pass the time until red99 is released, and to identify anyone claiming their server was harder, tougher, more hard-core, more red etc...and then to make alot of fun of them.

Personally i lump anyone claiming SZ was not THE SERVER TO PLAY as someone who has the potential to not be honest with themselves or others and unrealistic or biased towards themselves in the face of overwhelming facts.... for future considerations in any other discussions
  #25  
Old 05-05-2011, 02:07 AM
Haul Haul is offline
Fire Giant

Haul's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 721
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knightmare [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Rallos Zek. And not because of item loot.

It didn't matter what "team" you were on, there was no team. No safe race or safe zone. A pure free for all kill target means the guy next to you could be lvling or could be buying gear off you one moment, and turn around and kill you the next. You were not safe from anyone. Anywhere. Ever. Not even in your own starting zone next to a member of your own race.. nobody.

In fact on Rallos we called those people Kinslayers. Likely no term like this existed on the other servers, because you were safe from your own race, or your own team.
I support this.
  #26  
Old 05-05-2011, 03:51 AM
JayDee JayDee is offline
Planar Protector

JayDee's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,669
Default

Hey bros lets hold hands and blacklist people who pk others. We can also bag our gear at any sign of pvp since thats fun. Then we can race to attain no drop gear where looting players is moot.

When velious launches we can all participate together and join forces like Voltron to kill the sleeper.

4 level pvp range is awesome too. Between that and all the alliances, it will be like p99 with optional & consequential pvp.
__________________
  #27  
Old 05-05-2011, 03:53 AM
JayDee JayDee is offline
Planar Protector

JayDee's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,669
Default

lol fkn rz ngr fag
__________________
  #28  
Old 05-05-2011, 06:52 AM
naez naez is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: s0cal
Posts: 629
Send a message via ICQ to naez Send a message via AIM to naez Send a message via MSN to naez Send a message via Yahoo to naez
Default

yea i agree the only problem with item loot or like a really global leaderboard setup is it leads to some really pussy pvp.

then again, i always pussy pvp regardless so it has little effect on me besides less gankportunities
  #29  
Old 05-05-2011, 12:50 PM
Knightmare Knightmare is offline
Kobold

Knightmare's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 196
Default

I was actually commenting on the original posted question, which was:

Which Zek was the toughest.

I wouldn't want to play on an style RZ anymore, it was exactly as was mentioned, running while bagging and rushing to get no drop. It was tough, but it's wasn't usually fun, I lost my share of good gear lol.
__________________
~Knitemare T`Knite~
~Harbingers of Thule~

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uthgaard
I don't come into McDonalds and criticize your work.
  #30  
Old 05-05-2011, 01:54 PM
criptic criptic is offline
Decaying Skeleton

criptic's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1
Default

I played on rz/tz and sz. SZ was the hardest imo, what got me hooked on it was dinging lvl 6 and getting one shotted within 2 secs. I got a tell "welcome to sullon you fing noob" and knew i had found my server.

The massive pvp battles and corpse camping prevented sz from advancing in the pve realm, everyone who played on sz knew that if a big zone battle popped up that zone would be a war zone for hours or days.

To me, rz/tz was a walk in the park and boring.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:17 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.