Ring 8 roll

[Decidability]

Ring 8 drama today. Someone won the roll but let another player loot and turn-in quest. Happened today.

Both sides were under fierce "discussion"

[F51]

Originally Posted by Decidability [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ring 8 drama today. Someone won the roll but let another player loot and turn-in quest. Happened today.

Both sides were under fierce "discussion"

What is the ending? Scammers are punished by Llandris?

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...=322304&page=2

[Swish2]

From today I can technically turn up with someone who wants to win a Ring 8 roll and give them double the opportunity. That isn't fair, or is it?

[planarity]

Originally Posted by Swish2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

From today I can technically turn up with someone who wants to win a Ring 8 roll and give them double the opportunity. That isn't fair, or is it?

Do you have marching orders? Then yes it's completely fair. One roll per marching orders. The roll winner turns in their orders.

[NextToTheGods]

The winner of the roll turning in orders and then allowing someone to loot the head and final turn in has happened a ton of times in the past. It doesn’t allow for people to abuse the agreement at all since the character winning the roll has to be the one turning in the orders, however it does allow for the winner to decide where the ring ends up. I really don’t see the issue.

[Crashking]

Originally Posted by NextToTheGods [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The winner of the roll turning in orders and then allowing someone to loot the head and final turn in has happened a ton of times in the past. It doesn’t allow for people to abuse the agreement at all since the character winning the roll has to be the one turning in the orders, however it does allow for the winner to decide where the ring ends up. I really don’t see the issue.

I love all the drama that manages to show up on these things. All I can say is the GM's should make a sticky post about the rules to the roll so this stuff stop coming up. I've seen info from all kinds of angles but under a petition ... GM's stated NO MQing. so if some pulls one off, its a report-able, suspend-able offense per the last information I received directly. While i can see that it shouldn't matter what happens after roll winner turns in orders -- this is just misinformation currently until we can convince the staff to change ruling.

I have a petition that is ages old here now, addressed to this highest authority, about this issue from way back... basically requesting the sticky post, since the word of mouth method about what the true player agreement is / was tends to vary.

[Pootle]

Originally Posted by Crashking [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

All I can say is the GM's should make a sticky post about the rules to the roll so this stuff stop coming up.

There is one - In this very forum section you are posting in

[DromalPhrenia]

so.... what time is ring roll now?